summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>2015-01-15 20:20:05 +0100
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2015-01-20 13:53:07 +0100
commit33a3ebdc077fd85f1bf4d4586eea579b297461ae (patch)
treea3a6045efe0606f0dd0ae89df9f3db9cf7d84c06 /arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
parent14e153ef75eecae8fd0738ffb42120f4962a00cd (diff)
x86, fpu: Don't abuse has_fpu in __kernel_fpu_begin/end()
Now that we have in_kernel_fpu we can remove __thread_clear_has_fpu() in __kernel_fpu_begin(). And this allows to replace the asymmetrical and nontrivial use_eager_fpu + tsk_used_math check in kernel_fpu_end() with the same __thread_has_fpu() check. The logic becomes really simple; if _begin() does save() then _end() needs restore(), this is controlled by __thread_has_fpu(). Otherwise they do clts/stts unless use_eager_fpu(). Not only this makes begin/end symmetrical and imo more understandable, potentially this allows to change irq_fpu_usable() to avoid all other checks except "in_kernel_fpu". Also, with this patch __kernel_fpu_end() does restore_fpu_checking() and WARNs if it fails instead of math_state_restore(). I think this looks better because we no longer need __thread_fpu_begin(), and it would be better to report the failure in this case. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com Cc: bp@suse.de Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: luto@amacapital.net Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115192005.GC27332@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/i387.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/i387.c19
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index a81572338243..12088a3f459f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -81,9 +81,7 @@ void __kernel_fpu_begin(void)
this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, true);
if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) {
- __thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
__save_init_fpu(me);
- /* We do 'stts()' in __kernel_fpu_end() */
} else if (!use_eager_fpu()) {
this_cpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
clts();
@@ -93,17 +91,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_begin);
void __kernel_fpu_end(void)
{
- if (use_eager_fpu()) {
- /*
- * For eager fpu, most the time, tsk_used_math() is true.
- * Restore the user math as we are done with the kernel usage.
- * At few instances during thread exit, signal handling etc,
- * tsk_used_math() is false. Those few places will take proper
- * actions, so we don't need to restore the math here.
- */
- if (likely(tsk_used_math(current)))
- math_state_restore();
- } else {
+ struct task_struct *me = current;
+
+ if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) {
+ if (WARN_ON(restore_fpu_checking(me)))
+ drop_init_fpu(me);
+ } else if (!use_eager_fpu()) {
stts();
}