summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>2017-07-26 15:26:47 +0200
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>2017-07-27 10:05:48 +0200
commita85066840d29fc68d95ce7dbd6bcf15ef2775d66 (patch)
tree86c0619b327a1c103444d8ed2f646be347684a57 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
parent8fb6a5df4612757d6aa4218750aa3ecaca609bd0 (diff)
drm/i915: Rework sdvo proxy i2c locking
lockdep complaints about a locking recursion for the i2c bus lock because both the sdvo ddc proxy bus and the gmbus nested within use the same locking class. It's not really a deadlock since we never nest the other way round, but it's annoying. Fix it by pulling the gmbus locking into the i2c lock_ops for both i2c_adapater and making sure that the ddc_proxy_xfer function is entirely lockless. Re-layouting the extracted function resulted in some whitespace cleanups, I figured we might as well keep them. v2: Review from Chris: - s/locked/unlocked/ since I got the naming backwards - Use the vfuncs of the proxied adatper instead of re-rolling copies. That's more consistent with the other proxying we're doing. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170726132647.31833-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c62
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
index e58a47db9a9d..c14c05e8a543 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
@@ -451,23 +451,24 @@ static const char * const cmd_status_names[] = {
"Scaling not supported"
};
-static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
- const void *args, int args_len)
+static bool __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
+ const void *args, int args_len,
+ bool unlocked)
{
u8 *buf, status;
struct i2c_msg *msgs;
int i, ret = true;
- /* Would be simpler to allocate both in one go ? */
+ /* Would be simpler to allocate both in one go ? */
buf = kzalloc(args_len * 2 + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return false;
msgs = kcalloc(args_len + 3, sizeof(*msgs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!msgs) {
- kfree(buf);
+ kfree(buf);
return false;
- }
+ }
intel_sdvo_debug_write(intel_sdvo, cmd, args, args_len);
@@ -498,7 +499,10 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
msgs[i+2].len = 1;
msgs[i+2].buf = &status;
- ret = i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3);
+ if (unlocked)
+ ret = i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3);
+ else
+ ret = __i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("I2c transfer returned %d\n", ret);
ret = false;
@@ -516,6 +520,12 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
+ const void *args, int args_len)
+{
+ return __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo, cmd, args, args_len, true);
+}
+
static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
void *response, int response_len)
{
@@ -602,13 +612,13 @@ static int intel_sdvo_get_pixel_multiplier(const struct drm_display_mode *adjust
return 4;
}
-static bool intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
- u8 ddc_bus)
+static bool __intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
+ u8 ddc_bus)
{
/* This must be the immediately preceding write before the i2c xfer */
- return intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo,
- SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH,
- &ddc_bus, 1);
+ return __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo,
+ SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH,
+ &ddc_bus, 1, false);
}
static bool intel_sdvo_set_value(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, const void *data, int len)
@@ -2926,7 +2936,7 @@ static int intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
{
struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data;
- if (!intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(sdvo, sdvo->ddc_bus))
+ if (!__intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(sdvo, sdvo->ddc_bus))
return -EIO;
return sdvo->i2c->algo->master_xfer(sdvo->i2c, msgs, num);
@@ -2943,6 +2953,33 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy = {
.functionality = intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy_func
};
+static void proxy_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data;
+ sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->lock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags);
+}
+
+static int proxy_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data;
+ return sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->trylock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags);
+}
+
+static void proxy_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data;
+ sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->unlock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags);
+}
+
+const struct i2c_lock_operations proxy_lock_ops = {
+ .lock_bus = proxy_lock_bus,
+ .trylock_bus = proxy_trylock_bus,
+ .unlock_bus = proxy_unlock_bus,
+};
+
static bool
intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -2955,6 +2992,7 @@ intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo,
sdvo->ddc.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
sdvo->ddc.algo_data = sdvo;
sdvo->ddc.algo = &intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy;
+ sdvo->ddc.lock_ops = &proxy_lock_ops;
return i2c_add_adapter(&sdvo->ddc) == 0;
}