summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorU. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>2014-09-29 15:49:32 -0700
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>2014-10-06 16:47:24 +0200
commit673e7bbdb3920b62cfc6c710bea626b0a9b0f43a (patch)
tree374688115b4c6f01df23a1a8c08841b0e8cdd3e9 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915
parentebb69c95175609990af708ec90c46530f5a2c819 (diff)
drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA
Improper truncated integer division in the scale() function causes actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial) work-around should be sufficient for a majority of use-cases, but it is by no means a complete solution. TODO: Determine how best to scale "user" values to "hw" values, and vice-versa, when the ranges are of different sizes. That would be a buggy scenario even with this work-around. The issue was introduced in the following (v3.17-rc1) commit: 6dda730 drm/i915: respect the VBT minimum backlight brightness Note that for easier backporting this commit adds a duplicated macro. A follow-up cleanup patch rectifies this for 3.18+ v2: (thanks to Chris Wilson) clarify commit message, use rounded division macro v3: -DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() fails to build with CONFIG_X86_32=y. (Jani) -Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead. (Damien) -v1 and v2 originally authored by Joe Konno. Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-By: Joe Konno <joe.konno@intel.com> [danvet: Add backporting note.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index 18784470a760..97ff71f40dd3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ intel_panel_detect(struct drm_device *dev)
}
}
+#define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ll, d) \
+({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)/2; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
+
/**
* scale - scale values from one range to another
*
@@ -419,9 +422,8 @@ static uint32_t scale(uint32_t source_val,
source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max);
/* avoid overflows */
- target_val = (uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) *
- (target_max - target_min);
- do_div(target_val, source_max - source_min);
+ target_val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) *
+ (target_max - target_min), source_max - source_min);
target_val += target_min;
return target_val;