summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>2008-09-25 14:54:28 -0500
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2008-09-30 14:07:22 -0400
commit1f1c0e33a0ab1379272da68fe58abf586c8e96e5 (patch)
tree1c219832042d52808b117ef56efd4fe4fcbfe5ab /drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c
parent3bb91bff8165223aa14f015a6c9150a536b40d9b (diff)
p54: Fix sparse warnings
The command make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" drivers/net/wireless/p54/ generates the following warnings: .../p54common.c:152:38: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) .../p54common.c:152:38: expected restricted __be32 const [usertype] *p .../p54common.c:152:38: got unsigned int *<noident> .../p54common.c:184:15: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer .../p54common.c:185:29: warning: cast to restricted __le16 .../p54common.c:309:11: warning: symbol 'p54_rf_chips' was not declared. Should it be static? .../p54common.c:313:5: warning: symbol 'p54_parse_eeprom' was not declared. Should it be static? .../p54common.c:620:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) .../p54common.c:620:43: expected unsigned long [unsigned] [usertype] len .../p54common.c:620:43: got restricted __le16 [usertype] len .../p54common.c:780:41: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer .../p54common.c:781:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer .../p54common.c:1250:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) .../p54common.c:1250:28: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1250:28: got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1252:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) .../p54common.c:1252:28: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1252:28: got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1257:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) .../p54common.c:1257:42: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1257:42: got restricted __le16 .../p54common.c:1260:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) .../p54common.c:1260:42: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type .../p54common.c:1260:42: got restricted __le16 .../p54usb.c:228:10: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer .../p54usb.c:228:23: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer .../p54usb.c:228:7: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) .../p54usb.c:228:7: expected restricted __le32 [assigned] [usertype] chk .../p54usb.c:228:7: got unsigned int .../p54usb.c:221:8: warning: symbol 'p54u_lm87_chksum' was not declared. Should it be static? All of the above have been fixed. One question, however, remains: In struct bootrec, the array "data" is treated in many places as native CPU order, but it may be little-endian everywhere. As far as I can tell, this driver has only been used with little-endian hardware. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c
index 7444f3729779..1912f5e9a0a9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54usb.c
@@ -218,17 +218,17 @@ static void p54u_tx_3887(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, struct p54_control_hdr *data,
usb_submit_urb(data_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
-__le32 p54u_lm87_chksum(const u32 *data, size_t length)
+static __le32 p54u_lm87_chksum(const u32 *data, size_t length)
{
- __le32 chk = 0;
+ u32 chk = 0;
length >>= 2;
while (length--) {
- chk ^= cpu_to_le32(*data++);
+ chk ^= *data++;
chk = (chk >> 5) ^ (chk << 3);
}
- return chk;
+ return cpu_to_le32(chk);
}
static void p54u_tx_lm87(struct ieee80211_hw *dev,