diff options
| author | Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) <rostedt@goodmis.org> | 2016-02-15 12:36:14 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> | 2016-03-04 10:25:44 -0500 |
| commit | 999c2ceac0bcd8cb773e627151e4afaefe653427 (patch) | |
| tree | 4ee758faf381601f92a8bde48363e1e46a87ecc5 /include | |
| parent | 6bdec2b3a4bf4ecc5f9ba5ea24457fe57943fc61 (diff) | |
tracepoints: Do not trace when cpu is offline
[ Upstream commit f37755490fe9bf76f6ba1d8c6591745d3574a6a6 ]
The tracepoint infrastructure uses RCU sched protection to enable and
disable tracepoints safely. There are some instances where tracepoints are
used in infrastructure code (like kfree()) that get called after a CPU is
going offline, and perhaps when it is coming back online but hasn't been
registered yet.
This can probuce the following warning:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.0-00006-g0fe53e8-dirty #34 Tainted: G S
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/kmem.h:141 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU! rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/8/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Tainted: G S 4.4.0-00006-g0fe53e8-dirty #34
Call Trace:
[c0000005b76c78d0] [c0000000008b9540] .dump_stack+0x98/0xd4 (unreliable)
[c0000005b76c7950] [c00000000010c898] .lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x108/0x170
[c0000005b76c79e0] [c00000000029adc0] .kfree+0x390/0x440
[c0000005b76c7a80] [c000000000055f74] .destroy_context+0x44/0x100
[c0000005b76c7b00] [c0000000000934a0] .__mmdrop+0x60/0x150
[c0000005b76c7b90] [c0000000000e3ff0] .idle_task_exit+0x130/0x140
[c0000005b76c7c20] [c000000000075804] .pseries_mach_cpu_die+0x64/0x310
[c0000005b76c7cd0] [c000000000043e7c] .cpu_die+0x3c/0x60
[c0000005b76c7d40] [c0000000000188d8] .arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x28/0x40
[c0000005b76c7db0] [c000000000101e6c] .cpu_startup_entry+0x50c/0x560
[c0000005b76c7ed0] [c000000000043bd8] .start_secondary+0x328/0x360
[c0000005b76c7f90] [c000000000008a6c] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
This warning is not a false positive either. RCU is not protecting code that
is being executed while the CPU is offline.
Instead of playing "whack-a-mole(TM)" and adding conditional statements to
the tracepoints we find that are used in this instance, simply add a
cpu_online() test to the tracepoint code where the tracepoint will be
ignored if the CPU is offline.
Use of raw_smp_processor_id() is fine, as there should never be a case where
the tracepoint code goes from running on a CPU that is online and suddenly
gets migrated to a CPU that is offline.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455387773-4245-1-git-send-email-kda@linux-powerpc.org
Reported-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Fixes: 97e1c18e8d17b ("tracing: Kernel Tracepoints")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.28+
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/tracepoint.h | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index a5f7f3ecafa3..a6e1bca88cc6 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ * See the file COPYING for more details. */ +#include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/errno.h> #include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include <linux/static_key.h> @@ -129,6 +131,9 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); void *it_func; \ void *__data; \ \ + if (!cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id())) \ + return; \ + \ if (!(cond)) \ return; \ prercu; \ |