diff options
| author | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2018-01-29 02:49:01 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2018-01-31 12:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | f531fbb06a56361d4a9807bbb16db4facc8537d3 (patch) | |
| tree | 5e84c0c947e50877f9e3ba67a634ea5d838c2d23 /kernel/bpf | |
| parent | 265d7657c9baf09d57eb386d0374e912e9649626 (diff) | |
bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd
[ upstream commit f37a8cb84cce18762e8f86a70bd6a49a66ab964c ]
Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context
via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we
also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX.
The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or
BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than
that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add
test cases as well for BPF selftests.
Fixes: d691f9e8d440 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5c56ff9eeed2..076e4a0ff95e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); } +static bool is_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) +{ + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[regno]; + + return reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX; +} + static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size) { @@ -896,6 +903,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return -EACCES; } + if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) { + verbose("BPF_XADD stores into R%d context is not allowed\n", + insn->dst_reg); + return -EACCES; + } + /* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */ err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1); @@ -3012,6 +3025,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (err) return err; + if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) { + verbose("BPF_ST stores into R%d context is not allowed\n", + insn->dst_reg); + return -EACCES; + } + /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, |