summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2016-04-01 14:17:21 +0200
committerSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>2016-07-10 23:07:32 -0400
commitcf756388f8f34e02a338356b3685c46938139871 (patch)
treebc466e005c0391a306df45dc7c48f2371c48dede /net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
parent850c377e0e2d76723884d610ff40827d26aa21eb (diff)
netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
[ Upstream commit f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e ] Ben Hawkes says: In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it is possible for a user-supplied ipt_entry structure to have a large next_offset field. This field is not bounds checked prior to writing a counter value at the supplied offset. Base chains enforce absolute verdict. User defined chains are supposed to end with an unconditional return, xtables userspace adds them automatically. But if such return is missing we will move to non-existent next rule. Reported-by: Ben Hawkes <hawkes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
index 236dcd64ba06..d53050017324 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -456,6 +458,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
@@ -679,10 +683,8 @@ static int translate_table(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, void *entry0,
}
}
- if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0)) {
- duprintf("Looping hook\n");
+ if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0))
return -ELOOP;
- }
/* Finally, each sanity check must pass */
i = 0;