summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c77
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 45c69c4184c9..d3df65f83b5c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2318,12 +2318,6 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ref->in_tree = 0;
rb_erase(&ref->rb_node, &delayed_refs->root);
delayed_refs->num_entries--;
- /*
- * we modified num_entries, but as we're currently running
- * delayed refs, skip
- * wake_up(&delayed_refs->seq_wait);
- * here.
- */
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
ret = run_one_delayed_ref(trans, root, ref, extent_op,
@@ -2350,22 +2344,6 @@ next:
return count;
}
-static void wait_for_more_refs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
- struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs,
- unsigned long num_refs,
- struct list_head *first_seq)
-{
- spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
- pr_debug("waiting for more refs (num %ld, first %p)\n",
- num_refs, first_seq);
- wait_event(fs_info->tree_mod_seq_wait,
- num_refs != delayed_refs->num_entries ||
- fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list.next != first_seq);
- pr_debug("done waiting for more refs (num %ld, first %p)\n",
- delayed_refs->num_entries, fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list.next);
- spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
-}
-
#ifdef SCRAMBLE_DELAYED_REFS
/*
* Normally delayed refs get processed in ascending bytenr order. This
@@ -2460,13 +2438,11 @@ int btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs;
struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node *ref;
struct list_head cluster;
- struct list_head *first_seq = NULL;
int ret;
u64 delayed_start;
int run_all = count == (unsigned long)-1;
int run_most = 0;
- unsigned long num_refs = 0;
- int consider_waiting;
+ int loops;
/* We'll clean this up in btrfs_cleanup_transaction */
if (trans->aborted)
@@ -2484,7 +2460,7 @@ int btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster);
again:
- consider_waiting = 0;
+ loops = 0;
spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
#ifdef SCRAMBLE_DELAYED_REFS
@@ -2512,31 +2488,6 @@ again:
if (ret)
break;
- if (delayed_start >= delayed_refs->run_delayed_start) {
- if (consider_waiting == 0) {
- /*
- * btrfs_find_ref_cluster looped. let's do one
- * more cycle. if we don't run any delayed ref
- * during that cycle (because we can't because
- * all of them are blocked) and if the number of
- * refs doesn't change, we avoid busy waiting.
- */
- consider_waiting = 1;
- num_refs = delayed_refs->num_entries;
- first_seq = root->fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list.next;
- } else {
- wait_for_more_refs(root->fs_info, delayed_refs,
- num_refs, first_seq);
- /*
- * after waiting, things have changed. we
- * dropped the lock and someone else might have
- * run some refs, built new clusters and so on.
- * therefore, we restart staleness detection.
- */
- consider_waiting = 0;
- }
- }
-
ret = run_clustered_refs(trans, root, &cluster);
if (ret < 0) {
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
@@ -2549,9 +2500,26 @@ again:
if (count == 0)
break;
- if (ret || delayed_refs->run_delayed_start == 0) {
+ if (delayed_start >= delayed_refs->run_delayed_start) {
+ if (loops == 0) {
+ /*
+ * btrfs_find_ref_cluster looped. let's do one
+ * more cycle. if we don't run any delayed ref
+ * during that cycle (because we can't because
+ * all of them are blocked), bail out.
+ */
+ loops = 1;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * no runnable refs left, stop trying
+ */
+ BUG_ON(run_all);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (ret) {
/* refs were run, let's reset staleness detection */
- consider_waiting = 0;
+ loops = 0;
}
}
@@ -5296,9 +5264,6 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
rb_erase(&head->node.rb_node, &delayed_refs->root);
delayed_refs->num_entries--;
- smp_mb();
- if (waitqueue_active(&root->fs_info->tree_mod_seq_wait))
- wake_up(&root->fs_info->tree_mod_seq_wait);
/*
* we don't take a ref on the node because we're removing it from the