summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h')
-rw-r--r--include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h118
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 118 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h b/include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h
deleted file mode 100644
index d992782089fd..000000000000
--- a/include/asm-arm26/unaligned.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
-#define __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
-
-#include <asm/types.h>
-
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
-
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file. Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 3 7 3
- * 8 20 6 16 6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 4 7 4
- * 8 19 8 15 6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers). Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2_le(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4_le(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_le(ptr) \
- ({ \
- __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v; \
- __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr); \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: __v = *(ptr); break; \
- case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2_le(__p); break; \
- case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4_le(__p); break; \
- case 8: { \
- unsigned int __v1, __v2; \
- __v2 = __get_unaligned_4_le((__p+4)); \
- __v1 = __get_unaligned_4_le(__p); \
- __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1); \
- } \
- break; \
- default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p); break; \
- } \
- __v; \
- })
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- *__p++ = __v;
- *__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- __put_unaligned_2_le(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
- __put_unaligned_2_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8_le(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- /*
- * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
- * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
- * case - go for the extra register.
- */
- __put_unaligned_4_le(__v >> 32, __p+4);
- __put_unaligned_4_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define __put_unaligned_le(val,ptr) \
- ({ \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: \
- *(ptr) = (val); \
- break; \
- case 2: __put_unaligned_2_le((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 4: __put_unaligned_4_le((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 8: __put_unaligned_8_le((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \
- break; \
- } \
- (void) 0; \
- })
-
-/*
- * Select endianness
- */
-#define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
-#define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
-
-#endif