| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
|
commit 8417da6f2128008c431c7d130af6cd3d9079922e upstream.
Starting with 4.4, gcc will happily accept -Wno-<anything> in the
cc-option test and complain later when compiling a file that has some
other warning. This rather unexpected behavior is intentional as per
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28322, so work around it by testing for support of
the opposite option (without the no-). Introduce a new Makefile function
cc-disable-warning that does this and update two uses of cc-option in
the toplevel Makefile.
Reported-and-tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
|
commit af0e5d565d2fffcd97d1e2d89669d627cc04e8b8 upstream.
Disable the new -Wunused-but-set-variable that was added in gcc 4.6.0
It produces more false positives than useful warnings.
This can still be enabled using W=1
[gregkh - No it can not for 2.6.32, but we don't care]
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Tested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit 31110ebbec8688c6e9597b641101afc94e1c762a upstream.
"Paul Smith" <psmith@gnu.org> reported that we would fail
to build with a new check that may be enabled in an
upcoming version of make.
The error was:
Makefile:442: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
The problem is that we did stuff like this:
config %config: ...
The solution was simple - the above was split into two with identical
prerequisites and commands.
With only three lines it was not worth to try to avoid the duplication.
Cc: "Paul Smith" <psmith@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mandriva.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit a137802ee839ace40079bebde24cfb416f73208a upstream.
This causes kernel images that don't run init to completion with certain
broken gcc versions.
This fixes kernel bugzilla entry:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13012
I suspect the gcc problem is this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28230
Fix the problem by using the -fno-strict-overflow flag instead, which
not only does not exist in the known-to-be-broken versions of gcc (it
was introduced later than fwrapv), but seems to be much less disturbing
to gcc too: the difference in the generated code by -fno-strict-overflow
are smaller (compared to using neither flag) than when using -fwrapv.
Reported-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
Pushed-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
commit a3ca86aea507904148870946d599e07a340b39bf upstream.
Turning on this flag could prevent the compiler from optimising away
some "useless" checks for null pointers. Such bugs can sometimes become
exploitable at compile time because of the -O2 optimisation.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
An example that clearly shows this 'problem' is commit 6bf67672.
static void __devexit agnx_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct ieee80211_hw *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct agnx_priv *priv = dev->priv;
+ struct agnx_priv *priv;
AGNX_TRACE;
if (!dev)
return;
+ priv = dev->priv;
By reverting this patch, and compile it with and without
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks flag, we can see that the check for dev
is compiled away.
call printk #
- testq %r12, %r12 # dev
- je .L94 #,
movq %r12, %rdi # dev,
Clearly the 'fix' is to stop using dev before it is tested, but building
with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks flag at least makes it harder to
abuse.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg>
Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Wang Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit d0115552cdb0b4d4146975889fee2e9355515c4b upstream.
Sam Ravnborg says:
"We have several architectures that plays strange games with $(CC) and
$(CROSS_COMPILE).
So we need to postpone any use of $(call cc-option..) until we have
included the arch specific Makefile so we try with the correct $(CC)
version."
Requested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
commit 68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 upstream.
This makes sure that gcc doesn't try to optimize away wrapping
arithmetic, which the kernel occasionally uses for overflow testing, ie
things like
if (ptr + offset < ptr)
which technically is undefined for non-unsigned types. See
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12597
for details.
Not all versions of gcc support it, so we need to make it conditional
(it looks like it was introduced in gcc-3.4).
Reminded-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
