summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-09-21perf: Do the big rename: Performance Counters -> Performance EventsIngo Molnar
Bye-bye Performance Counters, welcome Performance Events! In the past few months the perfcounters subsystem has grown out its initial role of counting hardware events, and has become (and is becoming) a much broader generic event enumeration, reporting, logging, monitoring, analysis facility. Naming its core object 'perf_counter' and naming the subsystem 'perfcounters' has become more and more of a misnomer. With pending code like hw-breakpoints support the 'counter' name is less and less appropriate. All in one, we've decided to rename the subsystem to 'performance events' and to propagate this rename through all fields, variables and API names. (in an ABI compatible fashion) The word 'event' is also a bit shorter than 'counter' - which makes it slightly more convenient to write/handle as well. Thanks goes to Stephane Eranian who first observed this misnomer and suggested a rename. User-space tooling and ABI compatibility is not affected - this patch should be function-invariant. (Also, defconfigs were not touched to keep the size down.) This patch has been generated via the following script: FILES=$(find * -type f | grep -vE 'oprofile|[^K]config') sed -i \ -e 's/PERF_EVENT_/PERF_RECORD_/g' \ -e 's/PERF_COUNTER/PERF_EVENT/g' \ -e 's/perf_counter/perf_event/g' \ -e 's/nb_counters/nb_events/g' \ -e 's/swcounter/swevent/g' \ -e 's/tpcounter_event/tp_event/g' \ $FILES for N in $(find . -name perf_counter.[ch]); do M=$(echo $N | sed 's/perf_counter/perf_event/g') mv $N $M done FILES=$(find . -name perf_event.*) sed -i \ -e 's/COUNTER_MASK/REG_MASK/g' \ -e 's/COUNTER/EVENT/g' \ -e 's/\<event\>/event_id/g' \ -e 's/counter/event/g' \ -e 's/Counter/Event/g' \ $FILES ... to keep it as correct as possible. This script can also be used by anyone who has pending perfcounters patches - it converts a Linux kernel tree over to the new naming. We tried to time this change to the point in time where the amount of pending patches is the smallest: the end of the merge window. Namespace clashes were fixed up in a preparatory patch - and some stylistic fallout will be fixed up in a subsequent patch. ( NOTE: 'counters' are still the proper terminology when we deal with hardware registers - and these sed scripts are a bit over-eager in renaming them. I've undone some of that, but in case there's something left where 'counter' would be better than 'event' we can undo that on an individual basis instead of touching an otherwise nicely automated patch. ) Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-09-21perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() ↵Paul Mackerras
change Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant: arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart': arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow(). [ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> ] Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-09-11powerpc/perf_counters: Reduce stack usage of power_check_constraintsPaul Mackerras
Michael Ellerman reported stack-frame size warnings being produced for power_check_constraints(), which uses an 8*8 array of u64 and two 8*8 arrays of unsigned long, which are currently allocated on the stack, along with some other smaller variables. These arrays come to 1.5kB on 64-bit or 1kB on 32-bit, which is a bit too much for the stack. This fixes the problem by putting these arrays in the existing per-cpu cpu_hw_counters struct. This is OK because two of the call sites have interrupts disabled already; for the third call site we use get_cpu_var, which disables preemption, so we know we won't get a context switch while we're in power_check_constraints(). Note that power_check_constraints() can be called during context switch but is not called from interrupts. Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org) Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-09-11powerpc: Fix bug where perf_counters breaks oprofilePaul Mackerras
Currently there is a bug where if you use oprofile on a pSeries machine, then use perf_counters, then use oprofile again, oprofile will not work correctly; it will lose the PMU configuration the next time the hypervisor does a partition context switch, and thereafter won't count anything. Maynard Johnson identified the sequence causing the problem: - oprofile setup calls ppc_enable_pmcs(), which calls pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs, which tells the hypervisor that we want to use the PMU, and sets the "PMU in use" flag in the lppaca. This flag tells the hypervisor whether it needs to save and restore the PMU config. - The perf_counter code sets and clears the "PMU in use" flag directly as it context-switches the PMU between tasks, and leaves it clear when it finishes. - oprofile setup, called for a new oprofile run, calls ppc_enable_pmcs, which does nothing because it has already been called. In particular it doesn't set the "PMU in use" flag. This fixes the problem by arranging for ppc_enable_pmcs to always set the "PMU in use" flag. It makes the perf_counter code call ppc_enable_pmcs also rather than calling the lower-level function directly, and removes the setting of the "PMU in use" flag from pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs, since that is now done in its caller. This also removes the declaration of pasemi_enable_pmcs because it isn't defined anywhere. Reported-by: Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org) Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-08-09perf_counter/powerpc: Fix oops on cpus without perf_counter hardware supportPaul Mackerras
If we have the powerpc perf_counter backend compiled in, but the cpu we are running on is one where we don't support the PMU, we currently oops in hw_perf_group_sched_in if we try to use any counters, because ppmu is NULL in that case, and we unconditionally dereference ppmu. This fixes the problem by adding a check if ppmu is NULL at the beginning of hw_perf_group_sched_in, and also at the beginning of the other functions that get called from the perf_counter core, i.e. hw_perf_disable, hw_perf_enable, and hw_perf_counter_setup. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-18perf_counter: powerpc: Make powerpc perf_counter code safe for 32-bit kernelsPaul Mackerras
This abstracts a few things in arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c that are specific to 64-bit kernels, and provides definitions for 32-bit kernels. In particular, * Only 64-bit has MMCRA and the bits in it that give information about a PMU interrupt (sampled PR, HV, slot number etc.) * Only 64-bit has the lppaca and the lppaca->pmcregs_in_use field * Use of SDAR is confined to 64-bit for now * Only 64-bit has soft/lazy interrupt disable and therefore pseudo-NMIs (interrupts that occur while interrupts are soft-disabled) * Only 64-bit has PMC7 and PMC8 * Only 64-bit has the MSR_HV bit. This also fixes the types used in a couple of places, where we were using long types for things that need to be 64-bit. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org LKML-Reference: <19000.55590.634126.876084@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-18perf_counter: powerpc: Change how processor-specific back-ends get selectedPaul Mackerras
At present, the powerpc generic (processor-independent) perf_counter code has list of processor back-end modules, and at initialization, it looks at the PVR (processor version register) and has a switch statement to select a suitable processor-specific back-end. This is going to become inconvenient as we add more processor-specific back-ends, so this inverts the order: now each back-end checks whether it applies to the current processor, and registers itself if so. Furthermore, instead of looking at the PVR, back-ends now check the cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type string and match on that. Lastly, each back-end now specifies a name for itself so the core can print a nice message when a back-end registers itself. This doesn't provide any support for unregistering back-ends, but that wouldn't be hard to do and would allow back-ends to be modules. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org LKML-Reference: <19000.55529.762227.518531@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-18perf_counter: powerpc: Use unsigned long for register and constraint valuesPaul Mackerras
This changes the powerpc perf_counter back-end to use unsigned long types for hardware register values and for the value/mask pairs used in checking whether a given set of events fit within the hardware constraints. This is in preparation for adding support for the PMU on some 32-bit powerpc processors. On 32-bit processors the hardware registers are only 32 bits wide, and the PMU structure is generally simpler, so 32 bits should be ample for expressing the hardware constraints. On 64-bit processors, unsigned long is 64 bits wide, so using unsigned long vs. u64 (unsigned long long) makes no actual difference. This makes some other very minor changes: adjusting whitespace to line things up in initialized structures, and simplifying some code in hw_perf_disable(). Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org LKML-Reference: <19000.55473.26174.331511@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-15perf_counter: powerpc: Fix two compile warningsPaul Mackerras
This fixes a couple of compile warnings that crept into the powerpc perf_counter code recently: CC arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.o arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart': arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1016: warning: unused variable 'addr' arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'hw_perf_counter_init': arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:891: warning: 'ev' may be used uninitialized in this function Stephen Rothwell reported this against linux-next as well. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18998.12884.787039.22202@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-11perf_counter: powerpc: Implement generalized cache events for POWER processorsPaul Mackerras
This adds tables of event codes for the generalized cache events for all the currently supported powerpc processors: POWER{4,5,5+,6,7} and PPC970*, plus powerpc-specific code to use these tables when a generalized cache event is requested. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18992.36430.933526.742969@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-11perf_counters: powerpc: Add support for POWER7 processorsPaul Mackerras
This adds the back-end for the PMU on POWER7 processors. POWER7 has 4 fully-programmable counters and two fixed-function counters (which do respect the freeze conditions, can generate interrupts, and are writable, unlike PMC5/6 on POWER5+/6). Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18992.36329.189378.17992@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-11perf_counter: Accurate period dataPeter Zijlstra
We currently log hw.sample_period for PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, however this is incorrect. When we adjust the period, it will only take effect the next cycle but report it for the current cycle. So when we adjust the period for every cycle, we're always wrong. Solve this by keeping track of the last_period. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-11perf_counter: Introduce struct for sample dataPeter Zijlstra
For easy extension of the sample data, put it in a structure. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-06perf_counter: Separate out attr->type from attr->configIngo Molnar
Counter type is a frequently used value and we do a lot of bit juggling by encoding and decoding it from attr->config. Clean this up by creating a separate attr->type field. Also clean up the various similarly complex user-space bits all around counter attribute management. The net improvement is significant, and it will be easier to add a new major type (which is what triggered this cleanup). (This changes the ABI, all tools are adapted.) (PowerPC build-tested.) Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-04perf_counter: powerpc: Use new identifier names in powerpc-specific codePaul Mackerras
Commit b23f3325 ("perf_counter: Rename various fields") fixed up most of the uses of the renamed fields, but missed one instance of "record_type" in powerpc-specific code which needs to be changed to "sample_type", and a "PERF_RECORD_ADDR" in the same statement that needs to be changed to "PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR", causing compilation errors on powerpc. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18983.3111.770392.800486@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-03perf_counter: powerpc: Fix race causing "oops trying to read PMC0" errorsPaul Mackerras
When using interrupting counters and limited (non-interrupting) counters at the same time, it's possible that we get an interrupt in write_mmcr0() after writing MMCR0 but before we have set up the counters using limited PMCs. What happens then is that we get into perf_counter_interrupt() with counter->hw.idx = 0 for the limited counters, leading to the "oops trying to read PMC0" error message being printed. This fixes the problem by making perf_counter_interrupt() robust against counter->hw.idx being zero (the counter is just ignored in that case) and also by changing write_mmcr0() to write MMCR0 initially with the counter overflow interrupt enable bits masked (set to 0). If the MMCR0 value requested by the caller has either of those bits set, we write MMCR0 again with the requested value of those bits after setting up the limited counters properly. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> LKML-Reference: <18982.17684.138182.954599@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-02perf_counter: Rename perf_counter_hw_event => perf_counter_attrPeter Zijlstra
The structure isn't hw only and when I read event, I think about those things that fall out the other end. Rename the thing. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-06-02perf_counter: Rename various fieldsPeter Zijlstra
A few renames: s/irq_period/sample_period/ s/irq_freq/sample_freq/ s/PERF_RECORD_/PERF_SAMPLE_/ s/record_type/sample_type/ And change both the new sample_type and read_format to u64. Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-26perf_counter: powerpc: Implement interrupt throttlingPaul Mackerras
This implements interrupt throttling on powerpc. Since we don't have individual count enable/disable or interrupt enable/disable controls per counter, this simply sets the hardware counter to 0, meaning that it will not interrupt again until it has counted 2^31 counts, which will take at least 2^30 cycles assuming a maximum of 2 counts per cycle. Also, we set counter->hw.period_left to the maximum possible value (2^63 - 1), so we won't report overflows for this counter for the forseeable future. The unthrottle operation restores counter->hw.period_left and the hardware counter so that we will once again report a counter overflow after counter->hw.irq_period counts. [ Impact: new perfcounters robustness feature on PowerPC ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <18971.35823.643362.446774@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-18perf_counter: powerpc: initialize cpuhw pointer before usePaul Mackerras
Commit 9e35ad38 ("perf_counter: Rework the perf counter disable/enable") added code to the powerpc hw_perf_enable (renamed from hw_perf_restore) to test cpuhw->disabled and return immediately if it is not set (i.e. if the PMU is already enabled). Unfortunately the test got added before cpuhw was initialized, resulting in an oops the first time hw_perf_enable got called. This fixes it by moving the initialization of cpuhw to before cpuhw->disabled is tested. [ Impact: fix oops-causing bug on powerpc ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <18960.56772.869734.304631@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-15perf_counter: powerpc: supply more precise information on counter overflow ↵Paul Mackerras
events This uses values from the MMCRA, SIAR and SDAR registers on powerpc to supply more precise information for overflow events, including a data address when PERF_RECORD_ADDR is specified. Since POWER6 uses different bit positions in MMCRA from earlier processors, this converts the struct power_pmu limited_pmc5_6 field, which only had 0/1 values, into a flags field and defines bit values for its previous use (PPMU_LIMITED_PMC5_6) and a new flag (PPMU_ALT_SIPR) to indicate that the processor uses the POWER6 bit positions rather than the earlier positions. It also adds definitions in reg.h for the new and old positions of the bit that indicates that the SIAR and SDAR values come from the same instruction. For the data address, the SDAR value is supplied if we are not doing instruction sampling. In that case there is no guarantee that the address given in the PERF_RECORD_ADDR subrecord will correspond to the instruction whose address is given in the PERF_RECORD_IP subrecord. If instruction sampling is enabled (e.g. because this counter is counting a marked instruction event), then we only supply the SDAR value for the PERF_RECORD_ADDR subrecord if it corresponds to the instruction whose address is in the PERF_RECORD_IP subrecord. Otherwise we supply 0. [ Impact: support more PMU hardware features on PowerPC ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <18955.37028.48861.555309@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-15perf_counter: powerpc: use u64 for event codes internallyPaul Mackerras
Although the perf_counter API allows 63-bit raw event codes, internally in the powerpc back-end we had been using 32-bit event codes. This expands them to 64 bits so that we can add bits for specifying threshold start/stop events and instruction sampling modes later. This also corrects the return value of can_go_on_limited_pmc; we were returning an event code rather than just a 0/1 value in some circumstances. That didn't particularly matter while event codes were 32-bit, but now that event codes are 64-bit it might, so this fixes it. [ Impact: extend PowerPC perfcounter interfaces from u32 to u64 ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <18955.36874.472452.353104@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-15perf_counter: frequency based adaptive irq_periodPeter Zijlstra
Instead of specifying the irq_period for a counter, provide a target interrupt frequency and dynamically adapt the irq_period to match this frequency. [ Impact: new perf-counter attribute/feature ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <20090515132018.646195868@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-05-15perf_counter: Rework the perf counter disable/enablePeter Zijlstra
The current disable/enable mechanism is: token = hw_perf_save_disable(); ... /* do bits */ ... hw_perf_restore(token); This works well, provided that the use nests properly. Except we don't. x86 NMI/INT throttling has non-nested use of this, breaking things. Therefore provide a reference counter disable/enable interface, where the first disable disables the hardware, and the last enable enables the hardware again. [ Impact: refactor, simplify the PMU disable/enable logic ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-29perf_counter: powerpc: allow use of limited-function countersPaul Mackerras
POWER5+ and POWER6 have two hardware counters with limited functionality: PMC5 counts instructions completed in run state and PMC6 counts cycles in run state. (Run state is the state when a hardware RUN bit is 1; the idle task clears RUN while waiting for work to do and sets it when there is work to do.) These counters can't be written to by the kernel, can't generate interrupts, and don't obey the freeze conditions. That means we can only use them for per-task counters (where we know we'll always be in run state; we can't put a per-task counter on an idle task), and only if we don't want interrupts and we do want to count in all processor modes. Obviously some counters can't go on a limited hardware counter, but there are also situations where we can only put a counter on a limited hardware counter - if there are already counters on that exclude some processor modes and we want to put on a per-task cycle or instruction counter that doesn't exclude any processor mode, it could go on if it can use a limited hardware counter. To keep track of these constraints, this adds a flags argument to the processor-specific get_alternatives() functions, with three bits defined: one to say that we can accept alternative event codes that go on limited counters, one to say we only want alternatives on limited counters, and one to say that this is a per-task counter and therefore events that are gated by run state are equivalent to those that aren't (e.g. a "cycles" event is equivalent to a "cycles in run state" event). These flags are computed for each counter and stored in the counter->hw.counter_base field (slightly wonky name for what it does, but it was an existing unused field). Since the limited counters don't freeze when we freeze the other counters, we need some special handling to avoid getting skew between things counted on the limited counters and those counted on normal counters. To minimize this skew, if we are using any limited counters, we read PMC5 and PMC6 immediately after setting and clearing the freeze bit. This is done in a single asm in the new write_mmcr0() function. The code here is specific to PMC5 and PMC6 being the limited hardware counters. Being more general (e.g. having a bitmap of limited hardware counter numbers) would have meant more complex code to read the limited counters when freezing and unfreezing the normal counters, with conditional branches, which would have increased the skew. Since it isn't necessary for the code to be more general at this stage, it isn't. This also extends the back-ends for POWER5+ and POWER6 to be able to handle up to 6 counters rather than the 4 they previously handled. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> LKML-Reference: <18936.19035.163066.892208@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-29perfcounters: rename struct hw_perf_counter_ops into struct pmuRobert Richter
This patch renames struct hw_perf_counter_ops into struct pmu. It introduces a structure to describe a cpu specific pmu (performance monitoring unit). It may contain ops and data. The new name of the structure fits better, is shorter, and thus better to handle. Where it was appropriate, names of function and variable have been changed too. [ Impact: cleanup ] Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1241002046-8832-7-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-09perf_counter: powerpc: add nmi_enter/nmi_exit callsPaul Mackerras
Impact: fix potential deadlocks on powerpc Now that the core is using in_nmi() (added in e30e08f6, "perf_counter: fix NMI race in task clock"), we need the powerpc perf_counter_interrupt to call nmi_enter() and nmi_exit() in those cases where the interrupt happens when interrupts are soft-disabled. If interrupts were soft-enabled, we can treat it as a regular interrupt and do irq_enter/irq_exit around the whole routine. This lets us get rid of the test_perf_counter_pending() call at the end of perf_counter_interrupt, thus simplifying things a little. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18909.31952.873098.336615@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-08perf_counter: allow for data addresses to be recordedPeter Zijlstra
Paul suggested we allow for data addresses to be recorded along with the traditional IPs as power can provide these. For now, only the software pagefault events provide data addresses, but in the future power might as well for some events. x86 doesn't seem capable of providing this atm. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <20090408130409.394816925@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-08perf_counter: powerpc: set sample enable bit for marked instruction eventsPaul Mackerras
Impact: enable access to hardware feature POWER processors have the ability to "mark" a subset of the instructions and provide more detailed information on what happens to the marked instructions as they flow through the pipeline. This marking is enabled by the "sample enable" bit in MMCRA, and there are synchronization requirements around setting and clearing the bit. This adds logic to the processor-specific back-ends so that they know which events relate to marked instructions and set the sampling enable bit if any event that we want to put on the PMU is a marked instruction event. It also adds logic to the generic powerpc code to do the necessary synchronization if that bit is set. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18908.31930.1024.228867@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-08perf_counter: fix powerpc buildPaul Mackerras
Commit 4af4998b ("perf_counter: rework context time") changed struct perf_counter_context to have a 'time' field instead of a 'time_now' field, but neglected to fix the place in the powerpc perf_counter.c where the time_now field was accessed. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <18908.31922.411398.147810@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-07perf_counter: theres more to overflow than writing eventsPeter Zijlstra
Prepare for more generic overflow handling. The new perf_counter_overflow() method will handle the generic bits of the counter overflow, and can return a !0 return value, in which case the counter should be (soft) disabled, so that it won't count until it's properly disabled. XXX: do powerpc and swcounter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <20090406094517.812109629@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: make it possible for hw_perf_counter_init to return error codesPaul Mackerras
Impact: better error reporting At present, if hw_perf_counter_init encounters an error, all it can do is return NULL, which causes sys_perf_counter_open to return an EINVAL error to userspace. This isn't very informative for userspace; it means that userspace can't tell the difference between "sorry, oprofile is already using the PMU" and "we don't support this CPU" and "this CPU doesn't support the requested generic hardware event". This commit uses the PTR_ERR/ERR_PTR/IS_ERR set of macros to let hw_perf_counter_init return an error code on error rather than just NULL if it wishes. If it does so, that error code will be returned from sys_perf_counter_open to userspace. If it returns NULL, an EINVAL error will be returned to userspace, as before. This also adapts the powerpc hw_perf_counter_init to make use of this to return ENXIO, EINVAL, EBUSY, or EOPNOTSUPP as appropriate. It would be good to add extra error numbers in future to allow userspace to distinguish the various errors that are currently reported as EINVAL, i.e. irq_period < 0, too many events in a group, conflict between exclude_* settings in a group, and PMU resource conflict in a group. [ v2: fix a bug pointed out by Corey Ashford where error returns from hw_perf_counter_init were not handled correctly in the case of raw hardware events.] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090330171023.682428180@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: powerpc: only reserve PMU hardware when we need itPaul Mackerras
Impact: cooperate with oprofile At present, on PowerPC, if you have perf_counters compiled in, oprofile doesn't work. There is code to allow the PMU to be shared between competing subsystems, such as perf_counters and oprofile, but currently the perf_counter subsystem reserves the PMU for itself at boot time, and never releases it. This makes perf_counter play nicely with oprofile. Now we keep a count of how many perf_counter instances are counting hardware events, and reserve the PMU when that count becomes non-zero, and release the PMU when that count becomes zero. This means that it is possible to have perf_counters compiled in and still use oprofile, as long as there are no hardware perf_counters active. This also means that if oprofile is active, sys_perf_counter_open will fail if the hw_event specifies a hardware event. To avoid races with other tasks creating and destroying perf_counters, we use a mutex. We use atomic_inc_not_zero and atomic_add_unless to avoid having to take the mutex unless there is a possibility of the count going between 0 and 1. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090330171023.627912475@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: unify and fix delayed counter wakeupPeter Zijlstra
While going over the wakeup code I noticed delayed wakeups only work for hardware counters but basically all software counters rely on them. This patch unifies and generalizes the delayed wakeup to fix this issue. Since we're dealing with NMI context bits here, use a cmpxchg() based single link list implementation to track counters that have pending wakeups. [ This should really be generic code for delayed wakeups, but since we cannot use cmpxchg()/xchg() in generic code, I've let it live in the perf_counter code. -- Eric Dumazet could use it to aggregate the network wakeups. ] Furthermore, the x86 method of using TIF flags was flawed in that its quite possible to end up setting the bit on the idle task, loosing the wakeup. The powerpc method uses per-cpu storage and does appear to be sufficient. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090330171023.153932974@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: record time running and time enabled for each counterPaul Mackerras
Impact: new functionality Currently, if there are more counters enabled than can fit on the CPU, the kernel will multiplex the counters on to the hardware using round-robin scheduling. That isn't too bad for sampling counters, but for counting counters it means that the value read from a counter represents some unknown fraction of the true count of events that occurred while the counter was enabled. This remedies the situation by keeping track of how long each counter is enabled for, and how long it is actually on the cpu and counting events. These times are recorded in nanoseconds using the task clock for per-task counters and the cpu clock for per-cpu counters. These values can be supplied to userspace on a read from the counter. Userspace requests that they be supplied after the counter value by setting the PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED and/or PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING bits in the hw_event.read_format field when creating the counter. (There is no way to change the read format after the counter is created, though it would be possible to add some way to do that.) Using this information it is possible for userspace to scale the count it reads from the counter to get an estimate of the true count: true_count_estimate = count * total_time_enabled / total_time_running This also lets userspace detect the situation where the counter never got to go on the cpu: total_time_running == 0. This functionality has been requested by the PAPI developers, and will be generally needed for interpreting the count values from counting counters correctly. In the implementation, this keeps 5 time values (in nanoseconds) for each counter: total_time_enabled and total_time_running are used when the counter is in state OFF or ERROR and for reporting back to userspace. When the counter is in state INACTIVE or ACTIVE, it is the tstamp_enabled, tstamp_running and tstamp_stopped values that are relevant, and total_time_enabled and total_time_running are determined from them. (tstamp_stopped is only used in INACTIVE state.) The reason for doing it like this is that it means that only counters being enabled or disabled at sched-in and sched-out time need to be updated. There are no new loops that iterate over all counters to update total_time_enabled or total_time_running. This also keeps separate child_total_time_running and child_total_time_enabled fields that get added in when reporting the totals to userspace. They are separate fields so that they can be atomic. We don't want to use atomics for total_time_running, total_time_enabled etc., because then we would have to use atomic sequences to update them, which are slower than regular arithmetic and memory accesses. It is possible to measure total_time_running by adding a task_clock counter to each group of counters, and total_time_enabled can be measured approximately with a top-level task_clock counter (though inaccuracies will creep in if you need to disable and enable groups since it is not possible in general to disable/enable the top-level task_clock counter simultaneously with another group). However, that adds extra overhead - I measured around 15% increase in the context switch latency reported by lat_ctx (from lmbench) when a task_clock counter was added to each of 2 groups, and around 25% increase when a task_clock counter was added to each of 4 groups. (In both cases a top-level task-clock counter was also added.) In contrast, the code added in this commit gives better information with no overhead that I could measure (in fact in some cases I measured lower times with this code, but the differences were all less than one standard deviation). [ v2: address review comments by Andrew Morton. ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <18890.6578.728637.139402@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: new output ABI - part 1Peter Zijlstra
Impact: Rework the perfcounter output ABI use sys_read() only for instant data and provide mmap() output for all async overflow data. The first mmap() determines the size of the output buffer. The mmap() size must be a PAGE_SIZE multiple of 1+pages, where pages must be a power of 2 or 0. Further mmap()s of the same fd must have the same size. Once all maps are gone, you can again mmap() with a new size. In case of 0 extra pages there is no data output and the first page only contains meta data. When there are data pages, a poll() event will be generated for each full page of data. Furthermore, the output is circular. This means that although 1 page is a valid configuration, its useless, since we'll start overwriting it the instant we report a full page. Future work will focus on the output format (currently maintained) where we'll likey want each entry denoted by a header which includes a type and length. Further future work will allow to splice() the fd, also containing the async overflow data -- splice() would be mutually exclusive with mmap() of the data. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090323172417.470536358@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: add an mmap method to allow userspace to read hardware countersPaul Mackerras
Impact: new feature giving performance improvement This adds the ability for userspace to do an mmap on a hardware counter fd and get access to a read-only page that contains the information needed to translate a hardware counter value to the full 64-bit counter value that would be returned by a read on the fd. This is useful on architectures that allow user programs to read the hardware counters, such as PowerPC. The mmap will only succeed if the counter is a hardware counter monitoring the current process. On my quad 2.5GHz PowerPC 970MP machine, userspace can read a counter and translate it to the full 64-bit value in about 30ns using the mmapped page, compared to about 830ns for the read syscall on the counter, so this does give a significant performance improvement. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090323172417.297057964@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: remove the event config bitfieldsPeter Zijlstra
Since the bitfields turned into a bit of a mess, remove them and rely on good old masks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090323172417.059499915@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: fix type/event_id layout on big-endian systemsPaul Mackerras
Impact: build fix for powerpc Commit db3a944aca35ae61 ("perf_counter: revamp syscall input ABI") expanded the hw_event.type field into a union of structs containing bitfields. In particular it introduced a type field and a raw_type field, with the intention that the 1-bit raw_type field should overlay the most-significant bit of the 8-bit type field, and in fact perf_counter_alloc() now assumes that (or at least, assumes that raw_type doesn't overlay any of the bits that are 1 in the values of PERF_TYPE_{HARDWARE,SOFTWARE,TRACEPOINT}). Unfortunately this is not true on big-endian systems such as PowerPC, where bitfields are laid out from left to right, i.e. from most significant bit to least significant. This means that setting hw_event.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE will set hw_event.raw_type to 1. This fixes it by making the layout depend on whether or not __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is defined. It's a bit ugly, but that's what we get for using bitfields in a user/kernel ABI. Also, that commit didn't fix up some places in arch/powerpc/kernel/ perf_counter.c where hw_event.raw and hw_event.event_id were used. This fixes them too. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-04-06perf_counter: powerpc: clean up perc_counter_interruptPaul Mackerras
Impact: cleanup This updates the powerpc perf_counter_interrupt following on from the "perf_counter: unify irq output code" patch. Since we now use the generic perf_counter_output code, which sets the perf_counter_pending flag directly, we no longer need the need_wakeup variable. This removes need_wakeup and makes perf_counter_interrupt use get_perf_counter_pending() instead. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090319194234.024464535@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: unify irq output codePeter Zijlstra
Impact: cleanup Having 3 slightly different copies of the same code around does nobody any good. First step in revamping the output format. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090319194233.929962222@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: revamp syscall input ABIPeter Zijlstra
Impact: modify ABI The hardware/software classification in hw_event->type became a little strained due to the addition of tracepoint tracing. Instead split up the field and provide a type field to explicitly specify the counter type, while using the event_id field to specify which event to use. Raw counters still work as before, only the raw config now goes into raw_event. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090319194233.836807573@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-06perf_counter: abstract wakeup flag setting in core to fix powerpc buildPaul Mackerras
Impact: build fix for powerpc Commit bd753921015e7905 ("perf_counter: software counter event infrastructure") introduced a use of TIF_PERF_COUNTERS into the core perfcounter code. This breaks the build on powerpc because we use a flag in a per-cpu area to signal wakeups on powerpc rather than a thread_info flag, because the thread_info flags have to be manipulated with atomic operations and are thus slower than per-cpu flags. This fixes the by changing the core to use an abstracted set_perf_counter_pending() function, which is defined on x86 to set the TIF_PERF_COUNTERS flag and on powerpc to set the per-cpu flag (paca->perf_counter_pending). It changes the previous powerpc definition of set_perf_counter_pending to not take an argument and adds a clear_perf_counter_pending, so as to simplify the definition on x86. On x86, set_perf_counter_pending() is defined as a macro. Defining it as a static inline in arch/x86/include/asm/perf_counters.h causes compile failures because <asm/perf_counters.h> gets included early in <linux/sched.h>, and the definitions of set_tsk_thread_flag etc. are therefore not available in <asm/perf_counters.h>. (On powerpc this problem is avoided by defining set_perf_counter_pending etc. in <asm/hw_irq.h>.) Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-03-06perfcounters/powerpc: add support for POWER4 processorsPaul Mackerras
Impact: more hardware support This adds the back-end for the PMU on the POWER4 and POWER4+ processors (GP and GQ). This is quite similar to the PPC970, with 8 PMCs, but has fewer events than the PPC970. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-03-06perfcounters/powerpc: add support for POWER5+ processorsPaul Mackerras
Impact: more hardware support This adds the back-end for the PMU on the POWER5+ processors (i.e. GS, including GS DD3 aka POWER5++). This doesn't use the fixed-function PMC5 and PMC6 since they don't respect the freeze conditions and don't generate interrupts, as on POWER6. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-03-06perfcounters/powerpc: fix oops with multiple counters in a groupPaul Mackerras
Impact: fix oops-causing bug This fixes a bug in the powerpc hw_perf_counter_init where the code didn't initialize ctrs[n] before passing the ctrs array to check_excludes, leading to possible oopses and other incorrect behaviour. This fixes it by initializing ctrs[n] correctly. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-02-26perfcounters/powerpc: Add support for POWER5 processorsPaul Mackerras
This adds the back-end for the PMU on the POWER5 processor. This knows how to use the fixed-function PMC5 and PMC6 (instructions completed and run cycles). Unlike POWER6, PMC5/6 obey the freeze conditions and can generate interrupts, so their use doesn't impose any extra restrictions. POWER5+ is different and is not supported by this patch. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-02-23perfcounters/powerpc: Make exclude_kernel bit work on Apple G5 processorsPaul Mackerras
Currently, setting hw_event.exclude_kernel does nothing on the PPC970 variants used in Apple G5 machines, because they have the HV (hypervisor) bit in the MSR forced to 1, so as far as the PMU is concerned, the kernel runs in hypervisor mode. Thus we have to use the MMCR0_FCHV (freeze counters in hypervisor mode) bit rather than the MMCR0_FCS (freeze counters in supervisor mode) bit. This checks the MSR.HV bit at startup, and if it is set, we set the freeze_counters_kernel variable to MMCR0_FCHV (it was initialized to MMCR0_FCS). We then use that whenever we need to exclude kernel events. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-02-11perf_counters: allow users to count user, kernel and/or hypervisor eventsPaul Mackerras
Impact: new perf_counter feature This extends the perf_counter_hw_event struct with bits that specify that events in user, kernel and/or hypervisor mode should not be counted (i.e. should be excluded), and adds code to program the PMU mode selection bits accordingly on x86 and powerpc. For software counters, we don't currently have the infrastructure to distinguish which mode an event occurs in, so we currently fail the counter initialization if the setting of the hw_event.exclude_* bits would require us to distinguish. Context switches and CPU migrations are currently considered to occur in kernel mode. On x86, this changes the previous policy that only root can count kernel events. Now non-root users can count kernel events or exclude them. Non-root users still can't use NMI events, though. On x86 we don't appear to have any way to control whether hypervisor events are counted or not, so hw_event.exclude_hv is ignored. On powerpc, the selection of whether to count events in user, kernel and/or hypervisor mode is PMU-wide, not per-counter, so this adds a check that the hw_event.exclude_* settings are the same as other events on the PMU. Counters being added to a group have to have the same settings as the other hardware counters in the group. Counters and groups can only be enabled in hw_perf_group_sched_in or power_perf_enable if they have the same settings as any other counters already on the PMU. If we are not running on a hypervisor, the exclude_hv setting is ignored (by forcing it to 0) since we can't ever get any hypervisor events. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2009-01-14perf_counter: Add support for pinned and exclusive counter groupsPaul Mackerras
Impact: New perf_counter features A pinned counter group is one that the user wants to have on the CPU whenever possible, i.e. whenever the associated task is running, for a per-task group, or always for a per-cpu group. If the system cannot satisfy that, it puts the group into an error state where it is not scheduled any more and reads from it return EOF (i.e. 0 bytes read). The group can be released from error state and made readable again using prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_ENABLE). When we have finer-grained enable/disable controls on counters we'll be able to reset the error state on individual groups. An exclusive group is one that the user wants to be the only group using the CPU performance monitor hardware whenever it is on. The counter group scheduler will not schedule an exclusive group if there are already other groups on the CPU and will not schedule other groups onto the CPU if there is an exclusive group scheduled (that statement does not apply to groups containing only software counters, which can always go on and which do not prevent an exclusive group from going on). With an exclusive group, we will be able to let users program PMU registers at a low level without the concern that those settings will perturb other measurements. Along the way this reorganizes things a little: - is_software_counter() is moved to perf_counter.h. - cpuctx->active_oncpu now records the number of hardware counters on the CPU, i.e. it now excludes software counters. Nothing was reading cpuctx->active_oncpu before, so this change is harmless. - A new cpuctx->exclusive field records whether we currently have an exclusive group on the CPU. - counter_sched_out moves higher up in perf_counter.c and gets called from __perf_counter_remove_from_context and __perf_counter_exit_task, where we used to have essentially the same code. - __perf_counter_sched_in now goes through the counter list twice, doing the pinned counters in the first loop and the non-pinned counters in the second loop, in order to give the pinned counters the best chance to be scheduled in. Note that only a group leader can be exclusive or pinned, and that attribute applies to the whole group. This avoids some awkwardness in some corner cases (e.g. where a group leader is closed and the other group members get added to the context list). If we want to relax that restriction later, we can, and it is easier to relax a restriction than to apply a new one. This doesn't yet handle the case where a pinned counter is inherited and goes into error state in the child - the error state is not propagated up to the parent when the child exits, and arguably it should. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>