| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The new XTS code for aesni_intel uses input buffers directly as memory operands
for pxor instructions, which causes crash if those buffers are not aligned to
16 bytes.
Patch changes XTS code to handle unaligned memory correctly, by loading memory
with movdqu instead.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add more optimized XTS code for aesni_intel in 64-bit mode, for smaller stack
usage and boost for speed.
tcrypt results, with Intel i5-2450M:
256-bit key
enc dec
16B 0.98x 0.99x
64B 0.64x 0.63x
256B 1.29x 1.32x
1024B 1.54x 1.58x
8192B 1.57x 1.60x
512-bit key
enc dec
16B 0.98x 0.99x
64B 0.60x 0.59x
256B 1.24x 1.25x
1024B 1.39x 1.42x
8192B 1.38x 1.42x
I chose not to optimize smaller than block size of 256 bytes, since XTS is
practically always used with data blocks of size 512 bytes. This is why
performance is reduced in tcrypt for 64 byte long blocks.
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The 32 bit variant of cbc(aes) decrypt is using instructions requiring
128 bit aligned memory locations but fails to ensure this constraint in
the code. Fix this by loading the data into intermediate registers with
load unaligned instructions.
This fixes reported general protection faults related to aesni.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43223
Reported-by: Daniel <garkein@mailueberfall.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org [v2.6.39+]
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
64bytes
This patch fixes problem with packets that are not multiple of 64bytes.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hoban <adrian.hoban@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aidan O'Mahony <aidan.o.mahony@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
They were generated by 'codespell' and then manually reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
LKML-Reference: <1300389856-1099-3-git-send-email-lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
This patch fixes the problem with 2.16 binutils.
Signed-off-by: Aidan O'Mahony <aidan.o.mahony@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hoban <adrian.hoban@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Exclude AES-GCM code for x86-32 due to heavy usage of 64-bit registers
not available on x86-32.
While at it, fixed unregister order in aesni_exit().
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The AES-NI instructions are also available in legacy mode so the 32-bit
architecture may profit from those, too.
To illustrate the performance gain here's a short summary of a dm-crypt
speed test on a Core i7 M620 running at 2.67GHz comparing both assembler
implementations:
x86: i568 aes-ni delta
ECB, 256 bit: 93.8 MB/s 123.3 MB/s +31.4%
CBC, 256 bit: 84.8 MB/s 262.3 MB/s +209.3%
LRW, 256 bit: 108.6 MB/s 222.1 MB/s +104.5%
XTS, 256 bit: 105.0 MB/s 205.5 MB/s +95.7%
Additionally, due to some minor optimizations, the 64-bit version also
got a minor performance gain as seen below:
x86-64: old impl. new impl. delta
ECB, 256 bit: 121.1 MB/s 123.0 MB/s +1.5%
CBC, 256 bit: 285.3 MB/s 290.8 MB/s +1.9%
LRW, 256 bit: 263.7 MB/s 265.3 MB/s +0.6%
XTS, 256 bit: 251.1 MB/s 255.3 MB/s +1.7%
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch adds an optimized RFC4106 AES-GCM implementation for 64-bit
kernels. It supports 128-bit AES key size. This leverages the crypto
AEAD interface type to facilitate a combined AES & GCM operation to
be implemented in assembly code. The assembly code leverages Intel(R)
AES New Instructions and the PCLMULQDQ instruction.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hoban <adrian.hoban@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aidan O'Mahony <aidan.o.mahony@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Erdinc Ozturk <erdinc.ozturk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Guilford <james.guilford@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wajdi Feghali <wajdi.k.feghali@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Andrew Morton reported that AES-NI CTR optimization failed to compile
with gas 2.16.1, the error message is as follow:
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:752: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:753: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
To fix this, a gas macro is defined to assemble movq with 64bit
general purpose registers and XMM registers. The macro will generate
the raw .byte sequence for needed instructions.
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
To take advantage of the hardware pipeline implementation of AES-NI
instructions. CTR mode cryption is implemented in ASM to schedule
multiple AES-NI instructions one after another. This way, some latency
of AES-NI instruction can be eliminated.
Performance testing based on dm-crypt should 50% reduction of
ecryption/decryption time.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Old binutils do not support AES-NI instructions, to make kernel can be
compiled by them, .byte code is used instead of AES-NI assembly
instructions. But the readability and flexibility of raw .byte code is
not good.
So corresponding assembly instruction like gas macro is used instead.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Original implementation of aesni_cbc_dec do not save IV if input
length % 4 == 0. This will make decryption of next block failed.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Intel AES-NI is a new set of Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD)
instructions that are going to be introduced in the next generation of
Intel processor, as of 2009. These instructions enable fast and secure
data encryption and decryption, using the Advanced Encryption Standard
(AES), defined by FIPS Publication number 197. The architecture
introduces six instructions that offer full hardware support for
AES. Four of them support high performance data encryption and
decryption, and the other two instructions support the AES key
expansion procedure.
The white paper can be downloaded from:
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/isn/downloads/intelavx/AES-Instructions-Set_WP.pdf
AES may be used in soft_irq context, but MMX/SSE context can not be
touched safely in soft_irq context. So in_interrupt() is checked, if
in IRQ or soft_irq context, the general x86_64 implementation are used
instead.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
