summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-09-30x86/cmpxchg, locking/atomics: Remove superfluous definitionsNikolay Borisov
cmpxchg contained definitions for unused (x)add_* operations, dating back to the original ticket spinlock implementation. Nowadays these are unused so remove them. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474913478-17757-1-git-send-email-n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-30x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_*Borislav Petkov
Move them to a separate header and have the following dependency: x86/cpufeatures.h <- x86/processor.h <- x86/cpufeature.h This makes it easier to use the header in asm code and not include the whole cpufeature.h and add guards for asm. Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453842730-28463-5-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-13arch: Remove __ARCH_HAVE_CMPXCHGThomas Gleixner
We removed the only user of this define in the rtmutex code. Get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2014-07-11x86: Simplify __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG testsBorislav Petkov
Both the 32-bit and 64-bit cmpxchg.h header define __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG and there's ifdeffery which checks it. But since both bitness define it, we can just as well move it up to the main cmpxchg header and simpify a bit of code in doing that. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140711104338.GB17083@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2013-04-25x86 cmpxchg.h: fix wrong commentLi Zhong
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2012-10-02UAPI: (Scripted) Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in kernel ↵David Howells
system headers Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in kernel system headers. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2012-04-06x86: Use correct byte-sized register constraint in __add()H. Peter Anvin
Similar to: 2ca052a x86: Use correct byte-sized register constraint in __xchg_op() ... the __add() macro also needs to use a "q" constraint in the byte-sized case, lest we try to generate an illegal register. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F7A3315.501@goop.org Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: Leigh Scott <leigh123linux@googlemail.com> Cc: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@devbase.at> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.3
2012-04-06x86: Use correct byte-sized register constraint in __xchg_op()Jeremy Fitzhardinge
x86-64 can access the low half of any register, but i386 can only do it with a subset of registers. 'r' causes compilation failures on i386, but 'q' expresses the constraint properly. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F7A3315.501@goop.org Reported-by: Leigh Scott <leigh123linux@googlemail.com> Tested-by: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@devbase.at> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.3
2012-01-26x86: Properly parenthesize cmpxchg() macro argumentsJan Beulich
Quite oddly, all of the arguments passed through from the top level macros to the second level which didn't need parentheses had them, while the only expression (involving a parameter) needing them didn't. Very recently I got bitten by the lack thereof when using something like "array + index" for the first operand, with "array" being an array more narrow than int. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F2183A9020000780006F3E6@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2012-01-04x86: Fix and improve cmpxchg_double{,_local}()Jan Beulich
Just like the per-CPU ones they had several problems/shortcomings: Only the first memory operand was mentioned in the asm() operands, and the 2x64-bit version didn't have a memory clobber while the 2x32-bit one did. The former allowed the compiler to not recognize the need to re-load the data in case it had it cached in some register, while the latter was overly destructive. The types of the local copies of the old and new values were incorrect (the types of the pointed-to variables should be used here, to make sure the respective old/new variable types are compatible). The __dummy/__junk variables were pointless, given that local copies of the inputs already existed (and can hence be used for discarded outputs). The 32-bit variant of cmpxchg_double_local() referenced cmpxchg16b_local(). At once also: - change the return value type to what it really is: 'bool' - unify 32- and 64-bit variants - abstract out the common part of the 'normal' and 'local' variants Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F01F12A020000780006A19B@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-11-25x86: consolidate xchg and xadd macrosJeremy Fitzhardinge
They both have a basic "put new value in location, return old value" pattern, so they can use the same macro easily. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
2011-11-25x86/cmpxchg: add a locked add() helperJeremy Fitzhardinge
Mostly to remove some conditional code in spinlock.h. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
2011-08-29x86, cmpxchg: Use __compiletime_error() to make usage messages a bit nicerJeremy Fitzhardinge
Use __compiletime_error() to produce a compile-time error rather than link-time, where available. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E5BCC40.3030501@goop.org Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-08-29x86: Add xadd helper macroJeremy Fitzhardinge
Add a common xadd implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E5BCC40.3030501@goop.org Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-08-29x86, cmpxchg: Unify cmpxchg into cmpxchg.hJeremy Fitzhardinge
Everything that's actually common between 32 and 64-bit is moved into cmpxchg.h. xchg/cmpxchg will fail with a link error if they're passed an unsupported size (which includes 64-bit args on 32-bit systems). Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E5BCC40.3030501@goop.org Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2008-10-22x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>