From 84483ea42cd4f2781d6e97a83ab3ebd0ff19fb10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:48:13 -0700 Subject: rcu: add shiny new debug assists to Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt Add a section describing PROVE_RCU, DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD, and the __rcu sparse checking to the RCU checklist. Suggested-by: David Miller Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) (limited to 'Documentation/RCU') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt index 790d1a812376..c7c6788956f4 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt @@ -365,3 +365,26 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! and the compiler to freely reorder code into and out of RCU read-side critical sections. It is the responsibility of the RCU update-side primitives to deal with this. + +17. Use CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD, and + the __rcu sparse checks to validate your RCU code. These + can help find problems as follows: + + CONFIG_PROVE_RCU: check that accesses to RCU-protected data + structures are carried out under the proper RCU + read-side critical section, while holding the right + combination of locks, or whatever other conditions + are appropriate. + + CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD: check that you don't pass the + same object to call_rcu() (or friends) before an RCU + grace period has elapsed since the last time that you + passed that same object to call_rcu() (or friends). + + __rcu sparse checks: tag the pointer to the RCU-protected data + structure with __rcu, and sparse will warn you if you + access that pointer without the services of one of the + variants of rcu_dereference(). + + These debugging aids can help you find problems that are + otherwise extremely difficult to spot. -- cgit v1.2.3