From 6b68f01baa810e9f63fbf39e9d5c3ef1d94a966f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:31:12 +0100 Subject: x86: unify struct desc_ptr This patch unifies struct desc_ptr between i386 and x86_64. They can be expressed in the exact same way in C code, only having to change the name of one of them. As Xgt_desc_struct is ugly and big, this is the one that goes away. There's also a padding field in i386, but it is not really needed in the C structure definition. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/lguest/boot.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c index c751e3c03e85..aa0bdd5fc4bb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c +++ b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void lguest_write_idt_entry(struct desc_struct *dt, /* Changing to a different IDT is very rare: we keep the IDT up-to-date every * time it is written, so we can simply loop through all entries and tell the * Host about them. */ -static void lguest_load_idt(const struct Xgt_desc_struct *desc) +static void lguest_load_idt(const struct desc_ptr *desc) { unsigned int i; struct desc_struct *idt = (void *)desc->address; @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void lguest_load_idt(const struct Xgt_desc_struct *desc) * hypercall and use that repeatedly to load a new IDT. I don't think it * really matters, but wouldn't it be nice if they were the same? */ -static void lguest_load_gdt(const struct Xgt_desc_struct *desc) +static void lguest_load_gdt(const struct desc_ptr *desc) { BUG_ON((desc->size+1)/8 != GDT_ENTRIES); hcall(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(desc->address), GDT_ENTRIES, 0); -- cgit v1.2.3