From 5895ef9a5b746e7cc9ebda50c87fbd11562da0a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:36:26 +0900 Subject: libata: don't check whether to use DMA or not for no data commands There's no reason to check whether to use DMA or not for no data commands. Don't do it. While at it, make local variable using_pio in atapi_xlat() set iff ATAPI_PROT_PIO is going to be used and rename ata_check_atapi_dma() to atapi_check_dma() for consistency. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-core.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index cc816ca623d3..303fc0d2b978 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -4297,7 +4297,7 @@ void ata_sg_clean(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) } /** - * ata_check_atapi_dma - Check whether ATAPI DMA can be supported + * atapi_check_dma - Check whether ATAPI DMA can be supported * @qc: Metadata associated with taskfile to check * * Allow low-level driver to filter ATA PACKET commands, returning @@ -4310,7 +4310,7 @@ void ata_sg_clean(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) * RETURNS: 0 when ATAPI DMA can be used * nonzero otherwise */ -int ata_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) +int atapi_check_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap; -- cgit v1.2.3