From 9a94241afcc9a481691a9c29b7460217925b59b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean Delvare Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:20:56 +0200 Subject: i2c: Add support for custom probe function The probe method used by i2c_new_probed_device() may not be suitable for all cases. Let the caller provide its own, optional probe function. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- include/linux/i2c.h | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/i2c.h') diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h index 38dd4025aa4e..59a9f3cdc0b5 100644 --- a/include/linux/i2c.h +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h @@ -284,12 +284,15 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info); /* If you don't know the exact address of an I2C device, use this variant * instead, which can probe for device presence in a list of possible - * addresses. + * addresses. The "probe" callback function is optional. If it is provided, + * it must return 1 on successful probe, 0 otherwise. If it is not provided, + * a default probing method is used. */ extern struct i2c_client * i2c_new_probed_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info *info, - unsigned short const *addr_list); + unsigned short const *addr_list, + int (*probe)(struct i2c_adapter *, unsigned short addr)); /* For devices that use several addresses, use i2c_new_dummy() to make * client handles for the extra addresses. -- cgit v1.2.3