From fd2f4419b4cbe8fe90796df9617c355762afd6a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:23:44 +0200 Subject: sched: Provide p->on_rq Provide a generic p->on_rq because the p->se.on_rq semantics are unfavourable for lockless wakeups but needed for sched_fair. In particular, p->on_rq is only cleared when we actually dequeue the task in schedule() and not on any random dequeue as done by things like __migrate_task() and __sched_setscheduler(). This also allows us to remove p->se usage from !sched_fair code. Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Nick Piggin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152728.949545047@chello.nl --- kernel/sched_rt.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched_rt.c') diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index e7cebdc65f82..9ca4f5f879c4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing * if it is still active */ - if (p->se.on_rq && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1) + if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1) enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p); } @@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) || task_running(rq, task) || - !task->se.on_rq)) { + !task->on_rq)) { raw_spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock); lowest_rq = NULL; @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq) BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); BUG_ON(p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - BUG_ON(!p->se.on_rq); + BUG_ON(!p->on_rq); BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); return p; @@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) */ if (p && (p->prio < this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)) { WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); - WARN_ON(!p->se.on_rq); + WARN_ON(!p->on_rq); /* * There's a chance that p is higher in priority @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p, * Update the migration status of the RQ if we have an RT task * which is running AND changing its weight value. */ - if (p->se.on_rq && (weight != p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed)) { + if (p->on_rq && (weight != p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed)) { struct rq *rq = task_rq(p); if (!task_current(rq, p)) { @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks * now. */ - if (p->se.on_rq && !rq->rt.rt_nr_running) + if (p->on_rq && !rq->rt.rt_nr_running) pull_rt_task(rq); } @@ -1638,7 +1638,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * If that current running task is also an RT task * then see if we can move to another run queue. */ - if (p->se.on_rq && rq->curr != p) { + if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) && /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */ @@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (!p->se.on_rq) + if (!p->on_rq) return; if (rq->curr == p) { -- cgit v1.2.3