From 3695b3b18519099224efbc5875569d2cb6da256d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:29:05 +0100 Subject: bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op() From: Jann Horn [ Upstream commit 95a762e2c8c942780948091f8f2a4f32fce1ac6f ] Distinguish between BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit) and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit); only perform sign extension in the first case. Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set. Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue. v3: - add CVE number (Ben Hutchings) Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Acked-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index b03af36b8e87..8b1ebe4c6aba 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1790,10 +1790,17 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) /* case: R = imm * remember the value we stored into this reg */ + u64 imm; + + if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) + imm = insn->imm; + else + imm = (u32)insn->imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM; - regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = imm; + regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = imm; } } else if (opcode > BPF_END) { -- cgit v1.2.3