From 63d2b0e8b665306d304fb0494561292f4a964a67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ravi Bangoria Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:59:53 +0530 Subject: perf/ioctl: Add check for the sample_period value [ Upstream commit 913a90bc5a3a06b1f04c337320e9aeee2328dd77 ] perf_event_open() limits the sample_period to 63 bits. See: 0819b2e30ccb ("perf: Limit perf_event_attr::sample_period to 63 bits") Make ioctl() consistent with it. Also on PowerPC, negative sample_period could cause a recursive PMIs leading to a hang (reported when running perf-fuzzer). Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au Fixes: 0819b2e30ccb ("perf: Limit perf_event_attr::sample_period to 63 bits") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604042953.914-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/events/core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 5bbf7537a612..64ace5e9af2a 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4624,6 +4624,9 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg) if (perf_event_check_period(event, value)) return -EINVAL; + if (!event->attr.freq && (value & (1ULL << 63))) + return -EINVAL; + event_function_call(event, __perf_event_period, &value); return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3