summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
blob: 1e2705a050166489e2f948dcec94b1da6ab4c10c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
/*
 * AVR32 sempahore implementation.
 *
 * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation
 *
 * Based on linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
 *  Copyright (C) 1999 Linus Torvalds
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
 */

#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/module.h>

#include <asm/semaphore.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>

/*
 * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
 * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
 * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
 * variable is a count of such acquires.
 *
 * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
 * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
 * needs to do something only if count was negative before
 * the increment operation.
 *
 * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
 * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
 *
 * Note that these functions are only called when there is
 * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
 * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
 * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
 * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
 */

/*
 * Logic:
 *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
 *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
 *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
 *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
 *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
 *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
 */

void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
{
	wake_up(&sem->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);

void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
{
	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
        unsigned long flags;

        tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);

        sem->sleepers++;
        for (;;) {
                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;

                /*
                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
                 * the wait_queue_head.
                 */
                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
                        sem->sleepers = 0;
                        break;
                }
                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);

                schedule();

                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
                tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
        }
        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);

int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
{
	int retval = 0;
	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
        unsigned long flags;

        tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);

        sem->sleepers++;
        for (;;) {
                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;

		/*
		 * With signals pending, this turns into the trylock
		 * failure case - we won't be sleeping, and we can't
		 * get the lock as it has contention. Just correct the
		 * count and exit.
		 */
		if (signal_pending(current)) {
			retval = -EINTR;
			sem->sleepers = 0;
			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
			break;
		}

                /*
                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
                 * the wait_queue_head.
                 */
                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
                        sem->sleepers = 0;
                        break;
                }
                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);

                schedule();

                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
                tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
        }
        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);

        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
	return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);