summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>2015-07-12 02:22:50 +0200
committerMarcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>2015-07-12 02:22:50 +0200
commit5a472ddd7a2a017747d6c05c65eba2cd3804c02f (patch)
treebfd3fe2716296254959d3684f7c2591fff3582d7 /arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c
parent652004b987cb046bd5f5a1a04d1c9d47b01a7ab9 (diff)
tegra: lcd: video: integrate display driver for t30
On popular request make the display driver from T20 work on T30 as well. Turned out to be quite straight forward. However a few notes about some things encountered during porting: Of course the T30 device tree was completely missing host1x as well as PWM support but it turns out this can simply be copied from T20. The only trouble compiling the Tegra video driver for T30 had to do with some hard-coded PWM pin muxing for T20 which is quite ugly anyway. On T30 this gets handled by a board specific complete pin muxing table. The older Chromium U-Boot 2011.06 which to my knowledge was the only prior attempt at enabling a display driver for T30 for whatever reason got some clocking stuff mixed up. Turns out at least for a single display controller T20 and T30 can be clocked quite similar. Enjoy.
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c86
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d783576f41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pwm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+ * Tegra2 pulse width frequency modulator definitions
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors.
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
+#include <asm/arch/clock.h>
+#include <asm/arch-tegra/pwm.h>
+
+struct pwm_info {
+ struct pwm_ctlr *pwm; /* Registers for our pwm controller */
+ int pwm_node; /* PWM device tree node */
+} local;
+
+void pwm_enable(unsigned channel, int rate, int pulse_width, int freq_divider)
+{
+ u32 reg;
+
+ assert(channel < PWM_NUM_CHANNELS);
+
+ /* TODO: Can we use clock_adjust_periph_pll_div() here? */
+ clock_start_periph_pll(PERIPH_ID_PWM, CLOCK_ID_SFROM32KHZ, rate);
+
+ reg = PWM_ENABLE_MASK;
+ reg |= pulse_width << PWM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
+ reg |= freq_divider << PWM_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
+ writel(reg, &local.pwm[channel].control);
+ debug("%s: channel=%d, rate=%d\n", __func__, channel, rate);
+}
+
+int pwm_request(const void *blob, int node, const char *prop_name)
+{
+ int pwm_node;
+ u32 data[3];
+
+ if (fdtdec_get_int_array(blob, node, prop_name, data,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(data))) {
+ debug("%s: Cannot decode PWM property '%s'\n", __func__,
+ prop_name);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ pwm_node = fdt_node_offset_by_phandle(blob, data[0]);
+ if (pwm_node != local.pwm_node) {
+ debug("%s: PWM property '%s' phandle %d not recognised"
+ "- expecting %d\n", __func__, prop_name, data[0],
+ local.pwm_node);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (data[1] >= PWM_NUM_CHANNELS) {
+ debug("%s: PWM property '%s': invalid channel %u\n", __func__,
+ prop_name, data[1]);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * TODO: We could maintain a list of requests, but it might not be
+ * worth it for U-Boot.
+ */
+ return data[1];
+}
+
+int pwm_init(const void *blob)
+{
+ local.pwm_node = fdtdec_next_compatible(blob, 0,
+ COMPAT_NVIDIA_TEGRA20_PWM);
+ if (local.pwm_node < 0) {
+ debug("%s: Cannot find device tree node\n", __func__);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ local.pwm = (struct pwm_ctlr *)fdtdec_get_addr(blob, local.pwm_node,
+ "reg");
+ if (local.pwm == (struct pwm_ctlr *)FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) {
+ debug("%s: Cannot find pwm reg address\n", __func__);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ debug("Tegra PWM at %p, node %d\n", local.pwm, local.pwm_node);
+
+ return 0;
+}