summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKamlakant Patel <kamlakantp@marvell.com>2019-04-24 11:50:43 +0000
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-05-22 07:37:43 +0200
commitf6de0a3b1e66d544c1e4b28b5e864c574baa6dcc (patch)
tree0eef24f178701263a404bb5b1c6d87d9364bc1fe
parent88681649ed8c88cfe565a55b47728edee91d6d53 (diff)
ipmi:ssif: compare block number correctly for multi-part return messages
commit 55be8658c7e2feb11a5b5b33ee031791dbd23a69 upstream. According to ipmi spec, block number is a number that is incremented, starting with 0, for each new block of message data returned using the middle transaction. Here, the 'blocknum' is data[0] which always starts from zero(0) and 'ssif_info->multi_pos' starts from 1. So, we need to add +1 to blocknum while comparing with multi_pos. Fixes: 7d6380cd40f79 ("ipmi:ssif: Fix handling of multi-part return messages"). Reported-by: Kiran Kolukuluru <kirank@ami.com> Signed-off-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakantp@marvell.com> Message-Id: <1556106615-18722-1-git-send-email-kamlakantp@marvell.com> [Also added a debug log if the block numbers don't match.] Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c6
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
index 76c2010ba672..af44db2dfb68 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
@@ -688,12 +688,16 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result,
/* End of read */
len = ssif_info->multi_len;
data = ssif_info->data;
- } else if (blocknum != ssif_info->multi_pos) {
+ } else if (blocknum + 1 != ssif_info->multi_pos) {
/*
* Out of sequence block, just abort. Block
* numbers start at zero for the second block,
* but multi_pos starts at one, so the +1.
*/
+ if (ssif_info->ssif_debug & SSIF_DEBUG_MSG)
+ dev_dbg(&ssif_info->client->dev,
+ "Received message out of sequence, expected %u, got %u\n",
+ ssif_info->multi_pos - 1, blocknum);
result = -EIO;
} else {
ssif_inc_stat(ssif_info, received_message_parts);