diff options
| author | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> | 2014-06-06 14:35:35 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2014-06-30 20:01:31 -0700 |
| commit | 162692c2f829d4336609e55dec7c2451073ef519 (patch) | |
| tree | aff48c3a6a0e0f9860e4312c0e4f637798931b34 | |
| parent | 41772cf6bd35f4ece7a288f186d48aea07bd1d89 (diff) | |
mm: vmscan: clear kswapd's special reclaim powers before exiting
commit 71abdc15adf8c702a1dd535f8e30df50758848d2 upstream.
When kswapd exits, it can end up taking locks that were previously held
by allocating tasks while they waited for reclaim. Lockdep currently
warns about this:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:06:34PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-R} usage.
> kswapd2/1151 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> (&sig->group_rwsem){+++++?}, at: exit_signals+0x24/0x130
> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
> mark_held_locks+0xb9/0x140
> lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7a/0xe0
> kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x37/0x240
> flex_array_alloc+0x99/0x1a0
> cgroup_attach_task+0x63/0x430
> attach_task_by_pid+0x210/0x280
> cgroup_procs_write+0x16/0x20
> cgroup_file_write+0x120/0x2c0
> vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0
> SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0
> tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
> irq event stamp: 49
> hardirqs last enabled at (49): _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x70
> hardirqs last disabled at (48): _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0xa0
> softirqs last enabled at (0): copy_process.part.24+0x627/0x15f0
> softirqs last disabled at (0): (null)
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&sig->group_rwsem);
> <Interrupt>
> lock(&sig->group_rwsem);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> no locks held by kswapd2/1151.
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 30 PID: 1151 Comm: kswapd2 Not tainted 3.10.39+ #4
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> print_usage_bug+0x1f7/0x208
> mark_lock+0x21d/0x2a0
> __lock_acquire+0x52a/0xb60
> lock_acquire+0xa2/0x140
> down_read+0x51/0xa0
> exit_signals+0x24/0x130
> do_exit+0xb5/0xa50
> kthread+0xdb/0x100
> ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
This is because the kswapd thread is still marked as a reclaimer at the
time of exit. But because it is exiting, nobody is actually waiting on
it to make reclaim progress anymore, and it's nothing but a regular
thread at this point. Be tidy and strip it of all its powers
(PF_MEMALLOC, PF_SWAPWRITE, PF_KSWAPD, and the lockdep reclaim state)
before returning from the thread function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 907c8b7c995e..357ada63772c 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -3138,7 +3138,10 @@ static int kswapd(void *p) } } + tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD); current->reclaim_state = NULL; + lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state(); + return 0; } |