summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/device-mapper
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>2015-03-20 10:50:37 -0400
committerMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>2015-04-15 12:10:24 -0400
commit0e9cebe724597a76ab1b0ebc0a21e16f7db11b47 (patch)
tree8217c6cea86697a985a7f88ff4240bb93277db84 /Documentation/device-mapper
parent7f61f5a022101e0c38c3cff2ef9ace9c9c86dbfb (diff)
dm: add log writes target
Introduce a new target that is meant for file system developers to test file system integrity at particular points in the life of a file system. We capture all write requests and associated data and log them to a separate device for later replay. There is a userspace utility to do this replay. The idea behind this is to give file system developers a tool to verify that the file system is always consistent. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/device-mapper')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/device-mapper/log-writes.txt140
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/device-mapper/log-writes.txt b/Documentation/device-mapper/log-writes.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c10f30c9b534
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/device-mapper/log-writes.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+dm-log-writes
+=============
+
+This target takes 2 devices, one to pass all IO to normally, and one to log all
+of the write operations to. This is intended for file system developers wishing
+to verify the integrity of metadata or data as the file system is written to.
+There is a log_write_entry written for every WRITE request and the target is
+able to take arbitrary data from userspace to insert into the log. The data
+that is in the WRITE requests is copied into the log to make the replay happen
+exactly as it happened originally.
+
+Log Ordering
+============
+
+We log things in order of completion once we are sure the write is no longer in
+cache. This means that normal WRITE requests are not actually logged until the
+next REQ_FLUSH request. This is to make it easier for userspace to replay the
+log in a way that correlates to what is on disk and not what is in cache, to
+make it easier to detect improper waiting/flushing.
+
+This works by attaching all WRITE requests to a list once the write completes.
+Once we see a REQ_FLUSH request we splice this list onto the request and once
+the FLUSH request completes we log all of the WRITEs and then the FLUSH. Only
+completed WRITEs, at the time the REQ_FLUSH is issued, are added in order to
+simulate the worst case scenario with regard to power failures. Consider the
+following example (W means write, C means complete):
+
+W1,W2,W3,C3,C2,Wflush,C1,Cflush
+
+The log would show the following
+
+W3,W2,flush,W1....
+
+Again this is to simulate what is actually on disk, this allows us to detect
+cases where a power failure at a particular point in time would create an
+inconsistent file system.
+
+Any REQ_FUA requests bypass this flushing mechanism and are logged as soon as
+they complete as those requests will obviously bypass the device cache.
+
+Any REQ_DISCARD requests are treated like WRITE requests. Otherwise we would
+have all the DISCARD requests, and then the WRITE requests and then the FLUSH
+request. Consider the following example:
+
+WRITE block 1, DISCARD block 1, FLUSH
+
+If we logged DISCARD when it completed, the replay would look like this
+
+DISCARD 1, WRITE 1, FLUSH
+
+which isn't quite what happened and wouldn't be caught during the log replay.
+
+Target interface
+================
+
+i) Constructor
+
+ log-writes <dev_path> <log_dev_path>
+
+ dev_path : Device that all of the IO will go to normally.
+ log_dev_path : Device where the log entries are written to.
+
+ii) Status
+
+ <#logged entries> <highest allocated sector>
+
+ #logged entries : Number of logged entries
+ highest allocated sector : Highest allocated sector
+
+iii) Messages
+
+ mark <description>
+
+ You can use a dmsetup message to set an arbitrary mark in a log.
+ For example say you want to fsck a file system after every
+ write, but first you need to replay up to the mkfs to make sure
+ we're fsck'ing something reasonable, you would do something like
+ this:
+
+ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
+ dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
+ <run test>
+
+ This would allow you to replay the log up to the mkfs mark and
+ then replay from that point on doing the fsck check in the
+ interval that you want.
+
+ Every log has a mark at the end labeled "dm-log-writes-end".
+
+Userspace component
+===================
+
+There is a userspace tool that will replay the log for you in various ways.
+It can be found here: https://github.com/josefbacik/log-writes
+
+Example usage
+=============
+
+Say you want to test fsync on your file system. You would do something like
+this:
+
+TABLE="0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdb) log-writes /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
+dmsetup create log --table "$TABLE"
+mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
+dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
+
+mount /dev/mapper/log /mnt/btrfs-test
+<some test that does fsync at the end>
+dmsetup message log 0 mark fsync
+md5sum /mnt/btrfs-test/foo
+umount /mnt/btrfs-test
+
+dmsetup remove log
+replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --end-mark fsync
+mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs-test
+md5sum /mnt/btrfs-test/foo
+<verify md5sum's are correct>
+
+Another option is to do a complicated file system operation and verify the file
+system is consistent during the entire operation. You could do this with:
+
+TABLE="0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdb) log-writes /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
+dmsetup create log --table "$TABLE"
+mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
+dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
+
+mount /dev/mapper/log /mnt/btrfs-test
+<fsstress to dirty the fs>
+btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs-test
+umount /mnt/btrfs-test
+dmsetup remove log
+
+replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --end-mark mkfs
+btrfsck /dev/sdb
+replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --start-mark mkfs \
+ --fsck "btrfsck /dev/sdb" --check fua
+
+And that will replay the log until it sees a FUA request, run the fsck command
+and if the fsck passes it will replay to the next FUA, until it is completed or
+the fsck command exists abnormally.