summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>2016-06-06 16:24:44 -0400
committerKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>2016-06-07 11:00:39 +0200
commita7d7865fecd83adb98b20eca5eddef7efc94831d (patch)
tree2595dfd51ff6d81c65422b09b5d0ea7461540b1f /arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
parent2969c03763b40e946b46aee57ef083527711c69f (diff)
ARM: dts: exynos: Fix port nodes names for Exynos5420 Peach Pit board
Commit bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Peach Pit") fixed the DTC warnings about mismatches between unit names and reg properties in the Exynos5420 Peach Pit DTS. But unfortunately it also added a regression on the Peach Pit when changing the port node names since the OF graph logic expects the port nodes to be always named 'port'. The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt binding document says that when there is more than one port, '#address-cells', '#size-cells' and 'reg' properties should be used to number the port nodes. Fixes: bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Peach Pit") Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts13
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
index f9d2e4f1a0e0..1de972d46a87 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
hpd-gpios = <&gpx2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
ports {
- port0 {
+ port {
dp_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>;
};
@@ -631,13 +631,20 @@
use-external-pwm;
ports {
- port0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+
bridge_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
};
};
- port1 {
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+
bridge_in: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>;
};