summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>2020-02-03 11:40:54 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2020-02-24 08:36:31 +0100
commit39a7082195093a6e9b1965fabf20832a21ee9f07 (patch)
tree53de77e4f7901a21c7c3ee16287f714de10185f8 /block
parentb0d5c881d36ee822bdc57f70ec70f1ba232ee7e8 (diff)
block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs
[ Upstream commit f718b093277df582fbf8775548a4f163e664d282 ] Commit 478de3380c1c ("block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not referred by any process") fixed commit 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging") by descheduling an empty bfq_queue when it remains with not process reference. Yet, this still left a case uncovered: an empty bfq_queue with not process reference that remains in service. This happens for an in-service sync bfq_queue that is deemed to deserve I/O-dispatch plugging when it remains empty. Yet no new requests will arrive for such a bfq_queue if no process sends requests to it any longer. Even worse, the bfq_queue may happen to be prematurely freed while still in service (because there may remain no reference to it any longer). This commit solves this problem by preventing I/O dispatch from being plugged for the in-service bfq_queue, if the latter has no process reference (the bfq_queue is then prevented from remaining in service). Fixes: 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging") Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Reported-by: Patrick Dung <patdung100@gmail.com> Tested-by: Patrick Dung <patdung100@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r--block/bfq-iosched.c12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 0c6214497fcc..5498d05b873d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -3444,6 +3444,10 @@ static void bfq_dispatch_remove(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
static bool idling_needed_for_service_guarantees(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
+ /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */
+ if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq)))
+ return false;
+
return (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 &&
(bfqd->wr_busy_queues <
bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) ||
@@ -4077,6 +4081,10 @@ static bool idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound,
idling_boosts_thr;
+ /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */
+ if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq)))
+ return false;
+
bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound = !BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
@@ -4170,6 +4178,10 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqq->bfqd;
bool idling_boosts_thr_with_no_issue, idling_needed_for_service_guar;
+ /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */
+ if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq)))
+ return false;
+
if (unlikely(bfqd->strict_guarantees))
return true;