summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2014-02-14 16:30:41 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2014-02-24 13:37:43 +0100
commit1c0ca90207d61e4868043b5bbbbd7cc0bb1ac974 (patch)
tree73f2451ba1511d9b6449061a142561a382e63fbd /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
parentd9a789c7a07e96eda7515e43932ee608dcece34d (diff)
cpufreq: don't call cpufreq_update_policy() on CPU addition
cpufreq_update_policy() is called from two places currently. From a workqueue handled queued from cpufreq_bp_resume() for boot CPU and from cpufreq_cpu_callback() whenever a CPU is added. The first one makes sure that boot CPU is running on the frequency present in policy->cpu. But we don't really need a call from cpufreq_cpu_callback(), because we always call cpufreq_driver->init() (which will set policy->cur correctly) whenever first CPU of any policy is added back. And so every policy structure is guaranteed to have the right frequency in policy->cur. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 37f30550522a..c755b5fe317c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2175,7 +2175,6 @@ static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
__cpufreq_add_dev(dev, NULL, frozen);
- cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE: