summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mfd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2009-07-27 11:30:48 +0530
committerSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>2009-08-04 20:31:32 +0200
commit1cef8e41073efe47e809f49670eb461307e52ccc (patch)
treeaa598b771302e24450d87e5c83e5183627f49cb0 /drivers/mfd
parenta33a052f19a21d727847391c8c1aff3fb221c472 (diff)
mfd: twl4030 irq fixes
The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It is calling the 'unmask' function in a process context. :The mask/unmask/ack functions are only designed to be called from the IRQ handler code, or the proper API interfaces found in linux/interrupt.h. Also there is no need to have IRQ chaining mechanism. The right way to handle this is to claim the parent interrupt as a standard interrupt and arrange for handle_twl4030_pih to take care of the rest of the devices. Mail thread on this issue can be found at: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=124629940123396&w=2 Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mfd')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c55
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
index bae61b22501c..7d430835655f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
@@ -180,14 +180,9 @@ static struct completion irq_event;
static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
{
long irq = (long)data;
- struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
static unsigned i2c_errors;
static const unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
- if (!desc) {
- pr_err("twl4030: Invalid IRQ: %ld\n", irq);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
@@ -240,7 +235,7 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
}
local_irq_enable();
- desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+ enable_irq(irq);
}
return 0;
@@ -255,25 +250,13 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
* thread. All we do here is acknowledge and mask the interrupt and wakeup
* the kernel thread.
*/
-static void handle_twl4030_pih(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+static irqreturn_t handle_twl4030_pih(int irq, void *devid)
{
/* Acknowledge, clear *AND* mask the interrupt... */
- desc->chip->ack(irq);
- complete(&irq_event);
-}
-
-static struct task_struct *start_twl4030_irq_thread(long irq)
-{
- struct task_struct *thread;
-
- init_completion(&irq_event);
- thread = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq, "twl4030-irq");
- if (!thread)
- pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %ld thread!\n", irq);
-
- return thread;
+ disable_irq_nosync(irq);
+ complete(devid);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
@@ -734,18 +717,28 @@ int twl_init_irq(int irq_num, unsigned irq_base, unsigned irq_end)
}
/* install an irq handler to demultiplex the TWL4030 interrupt */
- task = start_twl4030_irq_thread(irq_num);
- if (!task) {
- pr_err("twl4030: irq thread FAIL\n");
- status = -ESRCH;
- goto fail;
- }
- set_irq_data(irq_num, task);
- set_irq_chained_handler(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih);
- return status;
+ init_completion(&irq_event);
+ status = request_irq(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ "TWL4030-PIH", &irq_event);
+ if (status < 0) {
+ pr_err("twl4030: could not claim irq%d: %d\n", irq_num, status);
+ goto fail_rqirq;
+ }
+
+ task = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq_num, "twl4030-irq");
+ if (IS_ERR(task)) {
+ pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %d thread!\n", irq_num);
+ status = PTR_ERR(task);
+ goto fail_kthread;
+ }
+ return status;
+fail_kthread:
+ free_irq(irq_num, &irq_event);
+fail_rqirq:
+ /* clean up twl4030_sih_setup */
fail:
for (i = irq_base; i < irq_end; i++)
set_irq_chip_and_handler(i, NULL, NULL);