summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLisa Nguyen <lisa@xenapiadmin.com>2013-10-20 21:33:20 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-10-21 05:48:15 +0100
commit29323b3e6bc65d95e2ef5add5db332fcb41ff2e6 (patch)
tree73421310887fdd04dcb6b46f464af49bcff51ad5 /drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
parentbcc3b70425b8be702fda069e3e3ed066a0e37de2 (diff)
staging: lustre: Remove typedef and update cfs_hash_lock union
Remove typedef keyword and rename the cfs_hash_lock_t union to cfs_hash_lock in libcfs_hash.h. These changes resolve the "Do not add new typedefs" warning generated by checkpatch.pl and meet kernel coding style. The union variables in hash.c are updated to reflect this change as well. Signed-off-by: Lisa Nguyen <lisa@xenapiadmin.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
index 29ce3807fc88..b0b8e3f81d51 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
@@ -119,25 +119,25 @@ CFS_MODULE_PARM(warn_on_depth, "i", uint, 0644,
struct cfs_wi_sched *cfs_sched_rehash;
static inline void
-cfs_hash_nl_lock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive) {}
+cfs_hash_nl_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive) {}
static inline void
-cfs_hash_nl_unlock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive) {}
+cfs_hash_nl_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive) {}
static inline void
-cfs_hash_spin_lock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive)
+cfs_hash_spin_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
{
spin_lock(&lock->spin);
}
static inline void
-cfs_hash_spin_unlock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive)
+cfs_hash_spin_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
{
spin_unlock(&lock->spin);
}
static inline void
-cfs_hash_rw_lock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive)
+cfs_hash_rw_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
{
if (!exclusive)
read_lock(&lock->rw);
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ cfs_hash_rw_lock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive)
}
static inline void
-cfs_hash_rw_unlock(cfs_hash_lock_t *lock, int exclusive)
+cfs_hash_rw_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
{
if (!exclusive)
read_unlock(&lock->rw);