summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>2014-11-07 22:44:58 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2014-11-26 13:45:11 -0800
commit030739f52e0ac1a5c12b04d0ee414f612a9c8729 (patch)
tree5bb6227ce718835039d1b207e9b7ad524813b6da /drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
parent698f140d67e0a92b6d4606c67fdf42b3853c34b6 (diff)
staging: octeon-ethernet: drop multiple NAPI instances
Octeon Ethernet driver is currently trying to wake up multiple CPU cores for parallel NAPI processing when needed, to cope with the fact that all network interfaces are handled through the same receive queue processed by a single core/interrupt (see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137209784914565&w=2). This partially overlaps with generic RPS functionality. Commit a6a39a7fcff5 ("staging: octeon-ethernet: disable load balance for receiving packet when CONFIG_RPS is enabled") already disabled this when RPS is enabled. Let's delete this code altogether as it has issues like packet reordering and potential problems with CPU offlining/onlining. Tested on EdgeRouter Lite. Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Acked-By: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c109
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 99 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
index 44e372f09683..1789a1221007 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
@@ -61,66 +61,7 @@
#include <asm/octeon/cvmx-gmxx-defs.h>
-struct cvm_napi_wrapper {
- struct napi_struct napi;
-} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
-static struct cvm_napi_wrapper cvm_oct_napi[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
-struct cvm_oct_core_state {
- int baseline_cores;
- /*
- * The number of additional cores that could be processing
- * input packets.
- */
- atomic_t available_cores;
- cpumask_t cpu_state;
-} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
-static struct cvm_oct_core_state core_state __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
-static int cvm_irq_cpu;
-
-static void cvm_oct_enable_napi(void *_)
-{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi[cpu].napi);
-}
-
-static void cvm_oct_enable_one_cpu(void)
-{
- int v;
- int cpu;
-
- /* Check to see if more CPUs are available for receive processing... */
- v = atomic_sub_if_positive(1, &core_state.available_cores);
- if (v < 0)
- return;
-
- /* ... if a CPU is available, Turn on NAPI polling for that CPU. */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- if (!cpu_test_and_set(cpu, core_state.cpu_state)) {
- v = smp_call_function_single(cpu, cvm_oct_enable_napi,
- NULL, 0);
- if (v)
- panic("Can't enable NAPI.");
- break;
- }
- }
-}
-
-static void cvm_oct_no_more_work(void)
-{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- if (cpu == cvm_irq_cpu) {
- enable_irq(OCTEON_IRQ_WORKQ0 + pow_receive_group);
- return;
- }
-
- cpu_clear(cpu, core_state.cpu_state);
- atomic_add(1, &core_state.available_cores);
-}
+static struct napi_struct cvm_oct_napi;
/**
* cvm_oct_do_interrupt - interrupt handler.
@@ -132,8 +73,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cvm_oct_do_interrupt(int cpl, void *dev_id)
{
/* Disable the IRQ and start napi_poll. */
disable_irq_nosync(OCTEON_IRQ_WORKQ0 + pow_receive_group);
- cvm_irq_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- cvm_oct_enable_napi(NULL);
+ napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -285,23 +225,6 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
cvmx_pow_work_request_async_nocheck(CVMX_SCR_SCRATCH, CVMX_POW_NO_WAIT);
did_work_request = 1;
}
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_RPS
- if (rx_count == 0) {
- /*
- * First time through, see if there is enough
- * work waiting to merit waking another
- * CPU.
- */
- union cvmx_pow_wq_int_cntx counts;
- int backlog;
- int cores_in_use = core_state.baseline_cores - atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
- counts.u64 = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_POW_WQ_INT_CNTX(pow_receive_group));
- backlog = counts.s.iq_cnt + counts.s.ds_cnt;
- if (backlog > budget * cores_in_use && napi != NULL)
- cvm_oct_enable_one_cpu();
- }
-#endif
rx_count++;
skb_in_hw = USE_SKBUFFS_IN_HW && work->word2.s.bufs == 1;
@@ -478,7 +401,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (rx_count < budget && napi != NULL) {
/* No more work */
napi_complete(napi);
- cvm_oct_no_more_work();
+ enable_irq(OCTEON_IRQ_WORKQ0 + pow_receive_group);
}
return rx_count;
}
@@ -513,18 +436,10 @@ void cvm_oct_rx_initialize(void)
if (NULL == dev_for_napi)
panic("No net_devices were allocated.");
- if (max_rx_cpus >= 1 && max_rx_cpus < num_online_cpus())
- atomic_set(&core_state.available_cores, max_rx_cpus);
- else
- atomic_set(&core_state.available_cores, num_online_cpus());
- core_state.baseline_cores = atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
-
- core_state.cpu_state = CPU_MASK_NONE;
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- netif_napi_add(dev_for_napi, &cvm_oct_napi[i].napi,
- cvm_oct_napi_poll, rx_napi_weight);
- napi_enable(&cvm_oct_napi[i].napi);
- }
+ netif_napi_add(dev_for_napi, &cvm_oct_napi, cvm_oct_napi_poll,
+ rx_napi_weight);
+ napi_enable(&cvm_oct_napi);
+
/* Register an IRQ handler to receive POW interrupts */
i = request_irq(OCTEON_IRQ_WORKQ0 + pow_receive_group,
cvm_oct_do_interrupt, 0, "Ethernet", cvm_oct_device);
@@ -545,15 +460,11 @@ void cvm_oct_rx_initialize(void)
int_pc.s.pc_thr = 5;
cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_POW_WQ_INT_PC, int_pc.u64);
-
- /* Scheduld NAPI now. This will indirectly enable interrupts. */
- cvm_oct_enable_one_cpu();
+ /* Schedule NAPI now. This will indirectly enable the interrupt. */
+ napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi);
}
void cvm_oct_rx_shutdown(void)
{
- int i;
- /* Shutdown all of the NAPIs */
- for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- netif_napi_del(&cvm_oct_napi[i].napi);
+ netif_napi_del(&cvm_oct_napi);
}