summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>2016-11-17 11:46:38 -0500
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2016-11-21 10:29:01 +0100
commit194a6b5b9cb6b91a5f7d86984165a3bc55188599 (patch)
treee8ffaad27b9b42a7cdf6092afa01cd01f4b28687 /kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
parent6d0d287891a022ebba572327cbd70b5de69a63a2 (diff)
sched/wake_q: Rename WAKE_Q to DEFINE_WAKE_Q
Currently the wake_q data structure is defined by the WAKE_Q() macro. This macro, however, looks like a function doing something as "wake" is a verb. Even checkpatch.pl was confused as it reported warnings like WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations #548: FILE: kernel/futex.c:3665: + int ret; + WAKE_Q(wake_q); This patch renames the WAKE_Q() macro to DEFINE_WAKE_Q() which clarifies what the macro is doing and eliminates the checkpatch.pl warnings. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479401198-1765-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com [ Resolved conflict and added missing rename. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/rtmutex.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 1ec0f48962b3..d8d7a153b711 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wqh))
{
- WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);