diff options
| author | Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> | 2020-01-13 16:29:23 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-01-23 08:20:32 +0100 |
| commit | 14dc0e8ee11b7a60e6517aee2e11b8d3162b1ce6 (patch) | |
| tree | 82eab1fc651237bd36baca35cb92fbbd4a5123c6 /mm | |
| parent | 90515d01c05eea9475e324a6e1605251606fee74 (diff) | |
mm/page-writeback.c: avoid potential division by zero in wb_min_max_ratio()
commit 6d9e8c651dd979aa666bee15f086745f3ea9c4b3 upstream.
Patch series "use div64_ul() instead of div_u64() if the divisor is
unsigned long".
We were first inspired by commit b0ab99e7736a ("sched: Fix possible divide
by zero in avg_atom () calculation"), then refer to the recently analyzed
mm code, we found this suspicious place.
201 if (min) {
202 min *= this_bw;
203 do_div(min, tot_bw);
204 }
And we also disassembled and confirmed it:
/usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 201
0xffffffff811c37da <__wb_calc_thresh+234>: xor %r10d,%r10d
0xffffffff811c37dd <__wb_calc_thresh+237>: test %rax,%rax
0xffffffff811c37e0 <__wb_calc_thresh+240>: je 0xffffffff811c3800 <__wb_calc_thresh+272>
/usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 202
0xffffffff811c37e2 <__wb_calc_thresh+242>: imul %r8,%rax
/usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 203
0xffffffff811c37e6 <__wb_calc_thresh+246>: mov %r9d,%r10d ---> truncates it to 32 bits here
0xffffffff811c37e9 <__wb_calc_thresh+249>: xor %edx,%edx
0xffffffff811c37eb <__wb_calc_thresh+251>: div %r10
0xffffffff811c37ee <__wb_calc_thresh+254>: imul %rbx,%rax
0xffffffff811c37f2 <__wb_calc_thresh+258>: shr $0x2,%rax
0xffffffff811c37f6 <__wb_calc_thresh+262>: mul %rcx
0xffffffff811c37f9 <__wb_calc_thresh+265>: shr $0x2,%rdx
0xffffffff811c37fd <__wb_calc_thresh+269>: mov %rdx,%r10
This series uses div64_ul() instead of div_u64() if the divisor is
unsigned long, to avoid truncation to 32-bit on 64-bit platforms.
This patch (of 3):
The variables 'min' and 'max' are unsigned long and do_div truncates
them to 32 bits, which means it can test non-zero and be truncated to
zero for division. Fix this issue by using div64_ul() instead.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200102081442.8273-2-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: 693108a8a667 ("writeback: make bdi->min/max_ratio handling cgroup writeback aware")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index a40c075fd8f1..29f9980c13ac 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -201,11 +201,11 @@ static void wb_min_max_ratio(struct bdi_writeback *wb, if (this_bw < tot_bw) { if (min) { min *= this_bw; - do_div(min, tot_bw); + min = div64_ul(min, tot_bw); } if (max < 100) { max *= this_bw; - do_div(max, tot_bw); + max = div64_ul(max, tot_bw); } } |