summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>2011-06-15 15:08:23 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-06-15 20:04:00 -0700
commit5f1a19070b16c20cdc71ed0e981bfa19f8f6a4ee (patch)
treef3eaeb7a040e2484d71485118d58e34eb0760bf3 /mm
parent4bbd61fb9726808e72ab2aa440401f6e5e1aa8f7 (diff)
mm: fix wrong kunmap_atomic() pointer
Running a ktest.pl test, I hit the following bug on x86_32: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:81 __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1() Hardware name: Modules linked in: Pid: 93, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.39-test+ #1 Call Trace: [<c04450da>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x91 [<c042f5df>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1 [<c042f5df>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1^M [<c0445111>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x24 [<c042f5df>] __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1 [<c04d4a22>] unmap_vmas+0x43a/0x4e0 [<c04d9065>] exit_mmap+0x91/0xd2 [<c0443057>] mmput+0x43/0xad [<c0448358>] exit_mm+0x111/0x119 [<c044855f>] do_exit+0x1ff/0x5fa [<c0454ea2>] ? set_current_blocked+0x3c/0x40 [<c0454f24>] ? sigprocmask+0x7e/0x8e [<c0448b55>] do_group_exit+0x65/0x88 [<c0448b90>] sys_exit_group+0x18/0x1c [<c0c3915f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38 ---[ end trace 8055f74ea3c0eb62 ]--- Running a ktest.pl git bisect, found the culprit: commit e303297e6c3a ("mm: extended batches for generic mmu_gather") But although this was the commit triggering the bug, it was not the one originally responsible for the bug. That was commit d16dfc550f53 ("mm: mmu_gather rework"). The code in zap_pte_range() has something that looks like the following: pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); do { [...] } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl); The pte starts off pointing at the first element in the page table directory that was returned by the pte_offset_map_lock(). When it's done with the page, pte will be pointing to anything between the next entry and the first entry of the next page inclusive. By doing a pte - 1, this puts the pte back onto the original page, which is all that pte_unmap_unlock() needs. In most archs (64 bit), this is not an issue as the pte is ignored in the pte_unmap_unlock(). But on 32 bit archs, where things may be kmapped, it is essential that the pte passed to pte_unmap_unlock() resides on the same page that was given by pte_offest_map_lock(). The problem came in d16dfc55 ("mm: mmu_gather rework") where it introduced a "break;" from the while loop. This alone did not seem to easily trigger the bug. But the modifications made by e303297e6 caused that "break;" to be hit on the first iteration, before the pte++. The pte not being incremented will now cause pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1) to be pointing to the previous page. This will cause the wrong page to be unmapped, and also trigger the warning above. The simple solution is to just save the pointer given by pte_offset_map_lock() and use it in the unlock. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/memory.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index b13e7dbc399b..87d935333f0d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1112,11 +1112,13 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
int force_flush = 0;
int rss[NR_MM_COUNTERS];
spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t *start_pte;
pte_t *pte;
again:
init_rss_vec(rss);
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ start_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ pte = start_pte;
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
do {
pte_t ptent = *pte;
@@ -1196,7 +1198,7 @@ again:
add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
/*
* mmu_gather ran out of room to batch pages, we break out of