summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>2011-06-17 03:45:15 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@conan.davemloft.net>2011-06-17 15:27:31 -0400
commit1eddceadb0d6441cd39b2c38705a8f5fec86e770 (patch)
treedb2c9a019a74d71cf2aab0268a1d561d6c5bbd84 /net/ipv4/af_inet.c
parentcab758ef30e0e40f783627abc4b66d1b48fecd49 (diff)
net: rfs: enable RFS before first data packet is received
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 à 23:38 -0400, David Miller a écrit : > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:50:46 +0100 > > > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 04:15 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> @@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > >> goto discard; > >> > >> if (nsk != sk) { > >> + sock_rps_save_rxhash(nsk, skb->rxhash); > >> if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) { > >> rsk = nsk; > >> goto reset; > >> > > > > I haven't tried this, but it looks reasonable to me. > > > > What about IPv6? The logic in tcp_v6_do_rcv() looks very similar. > > Indeed ipv6 side needs the same fix. > > Eric please add that part and resubmit. And in fact I might stick > this into net-2.6 instead of net-next-2.6 > OK, here is the net-2.6 based one then, thanks ! [PATCH v2] net: rfs: enable RFS before first data packet is received First packet received on a passive tcp flow is not correctly RFS steered. One sock_rps_record_flow() call is missing in inet_accept() But before that, we also must record rxhash when child socket is setup. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> CC: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> CC: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@conan.davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/af_inet.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/af_inet.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 9c1926027a26..eae1f676f870 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ int inet_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
lock_sock(sk2);
+ sock_rps_record_flow(sk2);
WARN_ON(!((1 << sk2->sk_state) &
(TCPF_ESTABLISHED | TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT | TCPF_CLOSE)));