summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/xfrm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2010-02-16 15:20:26 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2010-02-16 23:05:38 -0800
commit7d720c3e4f0c4fc152a6bf17e24244a3c85412d2 (patch)
tree36e037187ce79acb211702bea22e99c625787757 /net/xfrm
parent2bb4646fce8d09916b351d1a62f98db7cec6fc41 (diff)
percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to net
Add __percpu sparse annotations to net. These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be in a different address space and warn if accessed without going through percpu accessors. This patch doesn't affect normal builds. The macro and type tricks around snmp stats make things a bit interesting. DEFINE/DECLARE_SNMP_STAT() macros mark the target field as __percpu and SNMP_UPD_PO_STATS() macro is updated accordingly. All snmp_mib_*() users which used to cast the argument to (void **) are updated to cast it to (void __percpu **). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm')
-rw-r--r--net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c16
-rw-r--r--net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c6
-rw-r--r--net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c3
3 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
index 42cd18391f46..0fc5ff66d1fa 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@
struct ipcomp_tfms {
struct list_head list;
- struct crypto_comp **tfms;
+ struct crypto_comp * __percpu *tfms;
int users;
};
static DEFINE_MUTEX(ipcomp_resource_mutex);
-static void **ipcomp_scratches;
+static void * __percpu *ipcomp_scratches;
static int ipcomp_scratch_users;
static LIST_HEAD(ipcomp_tfms_list);
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ipcomp_output);
static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void)
{
int i;
- void **scratches;
+ void * __percpu *scratches;
if (--ipcomp_scratch_users)
return;
@@ -215,10 +215,10 @@ static void ipcomp_free_scratches(void)
free_percpu(scratches);
}
-static void **ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void)
+static void * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void)
{
int i;
- void **scratches;
+ void * __percpu *scratches;
if (ipcomp_scratch_users++)
return ipcomp_scratches;
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void **ipcomp_alloc_scratches(void)
return scratches;
}
-static void ipcomp_free_tfms(struct crypto_comp **tfms)
+static void ipcomp_free_tfms(struct crypto_comp * __percpu *tfms)
{
struct ipcomp_tfms *pos;
int cpu;
@@ -267,10 +267,10 @@ static void ipcomp_free_tfms(struct crypto_comp **tfms)
free_percpu(tfms);
}
-static struct crypto_comp **ipcomp_alloc_tfms(const char *alg_name)
+static struct crypto_comp * __percpu *ipcomp_alloc_tfms(const char *alg_name)
{
struct ipcomp_tfms *pos;
- struct crypto_comp **tfms;
+ struct crypto_comp * __percpu *tfms;
int cpu;
/* This can be any valid CPU ID so we don't need locking. */
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index eb870fcc29cc..cfceb6616ec1 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2428,19 +2428,19 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_statistics_init(struct net *net)
{
int rv;
- if (snmp_mib_init((void **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics,
+ if (snmp_mib_init((void __percpu **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics,
sizeof(struct linux_xfrm_mib)) < 0)
return -ENOMEM;
rv = xfrm_proc_init(net);
if (rv < 0)
- snmp_mib_free((void **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics);
+ snmp_mib_free((void __percpu **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics);
return rv;
}
static void xfrm_statistics_fini(struct net *net)
{
xfrm_proc_fini(net);
- snmp_mib_free((void **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics);
+ snmp_mib_free((void __percpu **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics);
}
#else
static int __net_init xfrm_statistics_init(struct net *net)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
index c083a4e4e796..003f2c437ac3 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ static int xfrm_statistics_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
int i;
for (i=0; xfrm_mib_list[i].name; i++)
seq_printf(seq, "%-24s\t%lu\n", xfrm_mib_list[i].name,
- snmp_fold_field((void **)net->mib.xfrm_statistics,
+ snmp_fold_field((void __percpu **)
+ net->mib.xfrm_statistics,
xfrm_mib_list[i].entry));
return 0;
}