summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/apparmor
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>2015-11-06 15:17:30 -0500
committerJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>2016-07-12 08:43:10 -0700
commitff118479a76dbece9ae1c65c7c6a3ebe9cfa73e0 (patch)
treef3c092146e85c89ed03b3cc708af9ad428593025 /security/apparmor
parent38dbd7d8be36b5e68c96a24b406f3653180c1c03 (diff)
apparmor: allow SYS_CAP_RESOURCE to be sufficient to prlimit another task
While using AppArmor, SYS_CAP_RESOURCE is insufficient to call prlimit on another task. The only other example of a AppArmor mediating access to another, already running, task (ignoring fork+exec) is ptrace. The AppArmor model for ptrace is that one of the following must be true: 1) The tracer is unconfined 2) The tracer is in complain mode 3) The tracer and tracee are confined by the same profile 4) The tracer is confined but has SYS_CAP_PTRACE 1), 2, and 3) are already true for setrlimit. We can match the ptrace model just by allowing CAP_SYS_RESOURCE. We still test the values of the rlimit since it can always be overridden using a value that means unlimited for a particular resource. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/apparmor')
-rw-r--r--security/apparmor/resource.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/security/apparmor/resource.c b/security/apparmor/resource.c
index 748bf0ca6c9f..67a6072ead4b 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/resource.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/resource.c
@@ -101,9 +101,11 @@ int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, struct task_struct *task,
/* TODO: extend resource control to handle other (non current)
* profiles. AppArmor rules currently have the implicit assumption
* that the task is setting the resource of a task confined with
- * the same profile.
+ * the same profile or that the task setting the resource of another
+ * task has CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
*/
- if (profile != task_profile ||
+ if ((profile != task_profile &&
+ aa_capable(profile, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE, 1)) ||
(profile->rlimits.mask & (1 << resource) &&
new_rlim->rlim_max > profile->rlimits.limits[resource].rlim_max))
error = -EACCES;