summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/bfq-iosched.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c')
-rw-r--r--block/bfq-iosched.c11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 7d45ac451745..93863c6173e6 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -3314,7 +3314,12 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because
* bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also
* weight-raised queues (see comments on
- * bfq_weights_tree_add()).
+ * bfq_weights_tree_add()). In particular, if bfqq is being
+ * weight-raised, it is important to idle only if there are
+ * other, non-weight-raised queues that may steal throughput
+ * to bfqq. Actually, we should be even more precise, and
+ * differentiate between interactive weight raising and
+ * soft real-time weight raising.
*
* As a side note, it is worth considering that the above
* device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the
@@ -3326,7 +3331,8 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
* to let requests be served in the desired order until all
* the requests already queued in the device have been served.
*/
- asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 ||
+ asymmetric_scenario = (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 &&
+ bfqd->wr_busy_queues < bfqd->busy_queues) ||
!bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd);
/*
@@ -3760,6 +3766,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags);
+ bfqq->bic = NULL;
bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq);
bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);