summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Makefile
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-01-17Linux 4.4.252Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210115121955.112329537@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-12Linux 4.4.251Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210111130032.469630231@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-12kbuild: don't hardcode depmod pathDominique Martinet
commit 436e980e2ed526832de822cbf13c317a458b78e1 upstream. depmod is not guaranteed to be in /sbin, just let make look for it in the path like all the other invoked programs Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-09Linux 4.4.250Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107143049.179580814@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-29Linux 4.4.249Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228124846.409999325@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-11Linux 4.4.248Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210142600.887734129@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-02Linux 4.4.247Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201084637.754785180@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-11-24Linux 4.4.246Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201123121804.306030358@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-11-22Linux 4.4.245Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201120104539.534424264@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-11-18Linux 4.4.244Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117122106.144800239@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-11-10Linux 4.4.243Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-11-10Linux 4.4.242Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109125020.852643676@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-10-29Linux 4.4.241Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027134900.532249571@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-10-17Linux 4.4.240Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201016090435.423923738@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-10-14Linux 4.4.239Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012132628.130632267@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-10-01Linux 4.4.238Greg Kroah-Hartman
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200929105928.198942536@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-23Linux 4.4.237Greg Kroah-Hartman
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200921162033.346434578@linuxfoundation.org/ Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-12Linux 4.4.236Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-03Linux 4.4.235Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-26Linux 4.4.234Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-08-21Linux 4.4.233Greg Kroah-Hartman
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-07-31Linux 4.4.232Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-07-31Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilationFangrui Song
commit ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 upstream. When CROSS_COMPILE is set (e.g. aarch64-linux-gnu-), if $(CROSS_COMPILE)elfedit is found at /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-elfedit, GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR will be set to /usr/bin/. --prefix= will be set to /usr/bin/ and Clang as of 11 will search for both $(prefix)aarch64-linux-gnu-$needle and $(prefix)$needle. GCC searchs for $(prefix)aarch64-linux-gnu/$version/$needle, $(prefix)aarch64-linux-gnu/$needle and $(prefix)$needle. In practice, $(prefix)aarch64-linux-gnu/$needle rarely contains executables. To better model how GCC's -B/--prefix takes in effect in practice, newer Clang (since https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3452a0d8c17f7166f479706b293caf6ac76ffd90) only searches for $(prefix)$needle. Currently it will find /usr/bin/as instead of /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-as. Set --prefix= to $(GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR)$(notdir $(CROSS_COMPILE)) (/usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-) so that newer Clang can find the appropriate cross compiling GNU as (when -no-integrated-as is in effect). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1099 Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> [nc: Adjust context, CLANG_FLAGS does not exist in 4.4] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-07-22Linux 4.4.231Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-09Linux 4.4.230Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-30Linux 4.4.229Sasha Levin
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-06-20Linux 4.4.228Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-20kbuild: force to build vmlinux if CONFIG_MODVERSION=yMasahiro Yamada
commit 4b50c8c4eaf06a825d1c005c0b1b4a8307087b83 upstream. This code does not work as stated in the comment. $(CONFIG_MODVERSIONS) is always empty because it is expanded before include/config/auto.conf is included. Hence, 'make modules' with CONFIG_MODVERSION=y cannot record the version CRCs. This has been broken since 2003, commit ("kbuild: Enable modules to be build using the "make dir/" syntax"). [1] [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/commit/?id=15c6240cdc44bbeef3c4797ec860f9765ef4f1a7 Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.5.71+ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-06-11Linux 4.4.227Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-03Linux 4.4.226Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-27Linux 4.4.225Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-20Linux 4.4.224Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-20Makefile: disallow data races on gcc-10 as wellSergei Trofimovich
commit b1112139a103b4b1101d0d2d72931f2d33d8c978 upstream. gcc-10 will rename --param=allow-store-data-races=0 to -fno-allow-store-data-races. The flag change happened at https://gcc.gnu.org/PR92046. Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20gcc-10: disable 'restrict' warning for nowLinus Torvalds
commit adc71920969870dfa54e8f40dac8616284832d02 upstream. gcc-10 now warns about passing aliasing pointers to functions that take restricted pointers. That's actually a great warning, and if we ever start using 'restrict' in the kernel, it might be quite useful. But right now we don't, and it turns out that the only thing this warns about is an idiom where we have declared a few functions to be "printf-like" (which seems to make gcc pick up the restricted pointer thing), and then we print to the same buffer that we also use as an input. And people do that as an odd concatenation pattern, with code like this: #define sysfs_show_gen_prop(buffer, fmt, ...) \ snprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s"fmt, buffer, __VA_ARGS__) where we have 'buffer' as both the destination of the final result, and as the initial argument. Yes, it's a bit questionable. And outside of the kernel, people do have standard declarations like int snprintf( char *restrict buffer, size_t bufsz, const char *restrict format, ... ); where that output buffer is marked as a restrict pointer that cannot alias with any other arguments. But in the context of the kernel, that 'use snprintf() to concatenate to the end result' does work, and the pattern shows up in multiple places. And we have not marked our own version of snprintf() as taking restrict pointers, so the warning is incorrect for now, and gcc picks it up on its own. If we do start using 'restrict' in the kernel (and it might be a good idea if people find places where it matters), we'll need to figure out how to avoid this issue for snprintf and friends. But in the meantime, this warning is not useful. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20gcc-10: disable 'stringop-overflow' warning for nowLinus Torvalds
commit 5a76021c2eff7fcf2f0918a08fd8a37ce7922921 upstream. This is the final array bounds warning removal for gcc-10 for now. Again, the warning is good, and we should re-enable all these warnings when we have converted all the legacy array declaration cases to flexible arrays. But in the meantime, it's just noise. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20gcc-10: disable 'array-bounds' warning for nowLinus Torvalds
commit 44720996e2d79e47d508b0abe99b931a726a3197 upstream. This is another fine warning, related to the 'zero-length-bounds' one, but hitting the same historical code in the kernel. Because C didn't historically support flexible array members, we have code that instead uses a one-sized array, the same way we have cases of zero-sized arrays. The one-sized arrays come from either not wanting to use the gcc zero-sized array extension, or from a slight convenience-feature, where particularly for strings, the size of the structure now includes the allocation for the final NUL character. So with a "char name[1];" at the end of a structure, you can do things like v = my_malloc(sizeof(struct vendor) + strlen(name)); and avoid the "+1" for the terminator. Yes, the modern way to do that is with a flexible array, and using 'offsetof()' instead of 'sizeof()', and adding the "+1" by hand. That also technically gets the size "more correct" in that it avoids any alignment (and thus padding) issues, but this is another long-term cleanup thing that will not happen for 5.7. So disable the warning for now, even though it's potentially quite useful. Having a slew of warnings that then hide more urgent new issues is not an improvement. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20gcc-10: disable 'zero-length-bounds' warning for nowLinus Torvalds
commit 5c45de21a2223fe46cf9488c99a7fbcf01527670 upstream. This is a fine warning, but we still have a number of zero-length arrays in the kernel that come from the traditional gcc extension. Yes, they are getting converted to flexible arrays, but in the meantime the gcc-10 warning about zero-length bounds is very verbose, and is hiding other issues. I missed one actual build failure because it was hidden among hundreds of lines of warning. Thankfully I caught it on the second go before pushing things out, but it convinced me that I really need to disable the new warnings for now. We'll hopefully be all done with our conversion to flexible arrays in the not too distant future, and we can then re-enable this warning. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initializedLinus Torvalds
commit 78a5255ffb6a1af189a83e493d916ba1c54d8c75 upstream. We have some rather random rules about when we accept the "maybe-initialized" warnings, and when we don't. For example, we consider it unreliable for gcc versions < 4.9, but also if -O3 is enabled, or if optimizing for size. And then various kernel config options disabled it, because they know that they trigger that warning by confusing gcc sufficiently (ie PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES). And now gcc-10 seems to be introducing a lot of those warnings too, so it falls under the same heading as 4.9 did. At the same time, we have a very straightforward way to _enable_ that warning when wanted: use "W=2" to enable more warnings. So stop playing these ad-hoc games, and just disable that warning by default, with the known and straight-forward "if you want to work on the extra compiler warnings, use W=123". Would it be great to have code that is always so obvious that it never confuses the compiler whether a variable is used initialized or not? Yes, it would. In a perfect world, the compilers would be smarter, and our source code would be simpler. That's currently not the world we live in, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-20kbuild: compute false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized cases in KconfigMasahiro Yamada
commit b303c6df80c9f8f13785aa83a0471fca7e38b24d upstream. Since -Wmaybe-uninitialized was introduced by GCC 4.7, we have patched various false positives: - commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os") turned off this option for -Os. - commit 815eb71e7149 ("Kbuild: disable 'maybe-uninitialized' warning for CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES") turned off this option for CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES - commit a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for "make W=1"") turned off this option for GCC < 4.9 Arnd provided more explanation in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/14/903 I think this looks better by shifting the logic from Makefile to Kconfig. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/350 Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-10Linux 4.4.223Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-05Linux 4.4.222Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-02Linux 4.4.221Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-04-24Linux 4.4.220Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-04-13Linux 4.4.219Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-04-02Linux 4.4.218Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-20Linux 4.4.217Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-11Linux 4.4.216Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-28Linux 4.4.215Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-14Linux 4.4.214Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-05Linux 4.4.213Greg Kroah-Hartman
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.0.4) at 2024-05-28 13:50:34 +0000