summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-10-05arm: sam9_l9260_defconfig: correct CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMITArtem Bityutskiy
UBI has changed the MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT semantics. It used to be a percent of total amount of eraseblock in the partition, and now it is the maximum amount of bad eraseblocks on the entire devise per 1024 eraseblocks. So not only the units changed, but also the meaning. Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com> says: "I found the board: https://www.olimex.com/dev/sam9-L9260.html and the nand datasheet: http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/pub/Main/LyrePrototype/K9xxG08UXM.pdf page 11, we can see that the max_bad_bebper1024 is 25 (100 for 4096)" Thus, use "25" for sam9. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
2012-10-05arm: sam9_l9260_defconfig: remove non-existing config optionShmulik Ladkani
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE has been removed and now we use CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT instead. Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
2012-10-05arm: sam9_l9260_defconfig: prepare to UBI config changeShmulik Ladkani
We are going to kill the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE configuration option soon and use the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT instead. In order to do this smoothly, we now introduce the new configuration option to sam9_l9260_defconfig, and will kill the old one after the corresponding UBI changes are done. Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
2010-06-10ARM: reduce defconfigsUwe Kleine-König
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
2009-12-18ARM: Kill CONFIG_CPU_32Russell King
26-bit ARM support was removed a long time ago, and this symbol has been defined to be 'y' ever since. As it's never disabled anymore, we can kill it without any side effects. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-01Fix rename of at91_nand -> atmel_nandPieter du Preez
Structs called at91_nand_data where renamed to atmel_nand_data and configs called *MTD_NAND_AT91* where renamed to *MTD_NAND_ATMEL*. This was unfortunately not done consistently, causing NAND chips not being initialised on several ARM boards. I am aware that the author of the original change did not rename MTD_NAND_AT91_BUSWIDTH to MTD_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH, for example. All *MTD_NAND_AT91* where renamed to *MTD_NAND_ATMEL* in order to keep naming consistency. This patch was only tested on a MACH_SAM9_L9260, as this is the only ARM board I have to my disposal. Before this patch: $ git-ls-files |xargs grep atmel_nand |wc -l 105 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep at91_nand |wc -l 4 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep MTD_NAND_ATMEL |wc -l 8 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep MTD_NAND_AT91 |wc -l 47 After this patch: $ git-ls-files |xargs grep atmel_nand |wc -l 109 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep at91_nand |wc -l 0 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep MTD_NAND_ATMEL |wc -l 55 $ git-ls-files |xargs grep MTD_NAND_AT91 |wc -l 0 Signed-off-by: Pieter du Preez <pdupreez@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2008-05-12[ARM] dyntick: Remove obsolete and unused ARM dyntick supportRussell King
dyntick is superseded by the clocksource/clockevent infrastructure, using the NO_HZ configuration option. No one implements dyntick on ARM anymore, so it's pointless keeping it around. Remove dyntick support. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-04-17[ARM] 4979/1: [AT91] Olimex SAM9-L9260 board supportAndrew Victor
Support for the Olimex SAM9-L9260 board. <http://www.olimex.com/dev/sam9-L9260.html> Original patch from Ivan Vasilev. Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>