summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-11-06perf/x86/amd: Change/fix NMI latency mitigation to use a timestampTom Lendacky
[ Upstream commit df4d29732fdad43a51284f826bec3e6ded177540 ] It turns out that the NMI latency workaround from commit: 6d3edaae16c6 ("x86/perf/amd: Resolve NMI latency issues for active PMCs") ends up being too conservative and results in the perf NMI handler claiming NMIs too easily on AMD hardware when the NMI watchdog is active. This has an impact, for example, on the hpwdt (HPE watchdog timer) module. This module can produce an NMI that is used to reset the system. It registers an NMI handler for the NMI_UNKNOWN type and relies on the fact that nothing has claimed an NMI so that its handler will be invoked when the watchdog device produces an NMI. After the referenced commit, the hpwdt module is unable to process its generated NMI if the NMI watchdog is active, because the current NMI latency mitigation results in the NMI being claimed by the perf NMI handler. Update the AMD perf NMI latency mitigation workaround to, instead, use a window of time. Whenever a PMC is handled in the perf NMI handler, set a timestamp which will act as a perf NMI window. Any NMIs arriving within that window will be claimed by perf. Anything outside that window will not be claimed by perf. The value for the NMI window is set to 100 msecs. This is a conservative value that easily covers any NMI latency in the hardware. While this still results in a window in which the hpwdt module will not receive its NMI, the window is now much, much smaller. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 6d3edaae16c6 ("x86/perf/amd: Resolve NMI latency issues for active PMCs") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-05-08perf/x86/amd: Update generic hardware cache events for Family 17hKim Phillips
commit 0e3b74e26280f2cf8753717a950b97d424da6046 upstream. Add a new amd_hw_cache_event_ids_f17h assignment structure set for AMD families 17h and above, since a lot has changed. Specifically: L1 Data Cache The data cache access counter remains the same on Family 17h. For DC misses, PMCx041's definition changes with Family 17h, so instead we use the L2 cache accesses from L1 data cache misses counter (PMCx060,umask=0xc8). For DC hardware prefetch events, Family 17h breaks compatibility for PMCx067 "Data Prefetcher", so instead, we use PMCx05a "Hardware Prefetch DC Fills." L1 Instruction Cache PMCs 0x80 and 0x81 (32-byte IC fetches and misses) are backward compatible on Family 17h. For prefetches, we remove the erroneous PMCx04B assignment which counts how many software data cache prefetch load instructions were dispatched. LL - Last Level Cache Removing PMCs 7D, 7E, and 7F assignments, as they do not exist on Family 17h, where the last level cache is L3. L3 counters can be accessed using the existing AMD Uncore driver. Data TLB On Intel machines, data TLB accesses ("dTLB-loads") are assigned to counters that count load/store instructions retired. This is inconsistent with instruction TLB accesses, where Intel implementations report iTLB misses that hit in the STLB. Ideally, dTLB-loads would count higher level dTLB misses that hit in lower level TLBs, and dTLB-load-misses would report those that also missed in those lower-level TLBs, therefore causing a page table walk. That would be consistent with instruction TLB operation, remove the redundancy between dTLB-loads and L1-dcache-loads, and prevent perf from producing artificially low percentage ratios, i.e. the "0.01%" below: 42,550,869 L1-dcache-loads 41,591,860 dTLB-loads 4,802 dTLB-load-misses # 0.01% of all dTLB cache hits 7,283,682 L1-dcache-stores 7,912,392 dTLB-stores 310 dTLB-store-misses On AMD Families prior to 17h, the "Data Cache Accesses" counter is used, which is slightly better than load/store instructions retired, but still counts in terms of individual load/store operations instead of TLB operations. So, for AMD Families 17h and higher, this patch assigns "dTLB-loads" to a counter for L1 dTLB misses that hit in the L2 dTLB, and "dTLB-load-misses" to a counter for L1 DTLB misses that caused L2 DTLB misses and therefore also caused page table walks. This results in a much more accurate view of data TLB performance: 60,961,781 L1-dcache-loads 4,601 dTLB-loads 963 dTLB-load-misses # 20.93% of all dTLB cache hits Note that for all AMD families, data loads and stores are combined in a single accesses counter, so no 'L1-dcache-stores' are reported separately, and stores are counted with loads in 'L1-dcache-loads'. Also note that the "% of all dTLB cache hits" string is misleading because (a) "dTLB cache": although TLBs can be considered caches for page tables, in this context, it can be misinterpreted as data cache hits because the figures are similar (at least on Intel), and (b) not all those loads (technically accesses) technically "hit" at that hardware level. "% of all dTLB accesses" would be more clear/accurate. Instruction TLB On Intel machines, 'iTLB-loads' measure iTLB misses that hit in the STLB, and 'iTLB-load-misses' measure iTLB misses that also missed in the STLB and completed a page table walk. For AMD Family 17h and above, for 'iTLB-loads' we replace the erroneous instruction cache fetches counter with PMCx084 "L1 ITLB Miss, L2 ITLB Hit". For 'iTLB-load-misses' we still use PMCx085 "L1 ITLB Miss, L2 ITLB Miss", but set a 0xff umask because without it the event does not get counted. Branch Predictor (BPU) PMCs 0xc2 and 0xc3 continue to be valid across all AMD Families. Node Level Events Family 17h does not have a PMCx0e9 counter, and corresponding counters have not been made available publicly, so for now, we mark them as unsupported for Families 17h and above. Reference: "Open-Source Register Reference For AMD Family 17h Processors Models 00h-2Fh" Released 7/17/2018, Publication #56255, Revision 3.03: https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/56255_OSRR.pdf [ mingo: tidied up the line breaks. ] Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+ Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e40ed1542dd7 ("perf/x86: Add perf support for AMD family-17h processors") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-27perf/x86/amd: Add event map for AMD Family 17hKim Phillips
commit 3fe3331bb285700ab2253dbb07f8e478fcea2f1b upstream. Family 17h differs from prior families by: - Does not support an L2 cache miss event - It has re-enumerated PMC counters for: - L2 cache references - front & back end stalled cycles So we add a new amd_f17h_perfmon_event_map[] so that the generic perf event names will resolve to the correct h/w events on family 17h and above processors. Reference sections 2.1.13.3.3 (stalls) and 2.1.13.3.6 (L2): https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/54945_PPR_Family_17h_Models_00h-0Fh.pdf Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+ Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e40ed1542dd7 ("perf/x86: Add perf support for AMD family-17h processors") [ Improved the formatting a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-17x86/perf/amd: Remove need to check "running" bit in NMI handlerLendacky, Thomas
commit 3966c3feca3fd10b2935caa0b4a08c7dd59469e5 upstream. Spurious interrupt support was added to perf in the following commit, almost a decade ago: 63e6be6d98e1 ("perf, x86: Catch spurious interrupts after disabling counters") The two previous patches (resolving the race condition when disabling a PMC and NMI latency mitigation) allow for the removal of this older spurious interrupt support. Currently in x86_pmu_stop(), the bit for the PMC in the active_mask bitmap is cleared before disabling the PMC, which sets up a race condition. This race condition was mitigated by introducing the running bitmap. That race condition can be eliminated by first disabling the PMC, waiting for PMC reset on overflow and then clearing the bit for the PMC in the active_mask bitmap. The NMI handler will not re-enable a disabled counter. If x86_pmu_stop() is called from the perf NMI handler, the NMI latency mitigation support will guard against any unhandled NMI messages. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x- Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-17x86/perf/amd: Resolve NMI latency issues for active PMCsLendacky, Thomas
commit 6d3edaae16c6c7d238360f2841212c2b26774d5e upstream. On AMD processors, the detection of an overflowed PMC counter in the NMI handler relies on the current value of the PMC. So, for example, to check for overflow on a 48-bit counter, bit 47 is checked to see if it is 1 (not overflowed) or 0 (overflowed). When the perf NMI handler executes it does not know in advance which PMC counters have overflowed. As such, the NMI handler will process all active PMC counters that have overflowed. NMI latency in newer AMD processors can result in multiple overflowed PMC counters being processed in one NMI and then a subsequent NMI, that does not appear to be a back-to-back NMI, not finding any PMC counters that have overflowed. This may appear to be an unhandled NMI resulting in either a panic or a series of messages, depending on how the kernel was configured. To mitigate this issue, add an AMD handle_irq callback function, amd_pmu_handle_irq(), that will invoke the common x86_pmu_handle_irq() function and upon return perform some additional processing that will indicate if the NMI has been handled or would have been handled had an earlier NMI not handled the overflowed PMC. Using a per-CPU variable, a minimum value of the number of active PMCs or 2 will be set whenever a PMC is active. This is used to indicate the possible number of NMIs that can still occur. The value of 2 is used for when an NMI does not arrive at the LAPIC in time to be collapsed into an already pending NMI. Each time the function is called without having handled an overflowed counter, the per-CPU value is checked. If the value is non-zero, it is decremented and the NMI indicates that it handled the NMI. If the value is zero, then the NMI indicates that it did not handle the NMI. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x- Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-17x86/perf/amd: Resolve race condition when disabling PMCLendacky, Thomas
commit 914123fa39042e651d79eaf86bbf63a1b938dddf upstream. On AMD processors, the detection of an overflowed counter in the NMI handler relies on the current value of the counter. So, for example, to check for overflow on a 48 bit counter, bit 47 is checked to see if it is 1 (not overflowed) or 0 (overflowed). There is currently a race condition present when disabling and then updating the PMC. Increased NMI latency in newer AMD processors makes this race condition more pronounced. If the counter value has overflowed, it is possible to update the PMC value before the NMI handler can run. The updated PMC value is not an overflowed value, so when the perf NMI handler does run, it will not find an overflowed counter. This may appear as an unknown NMI resulting in either a panic or a series of messages, depending on how the kernel is configured. To eliminate this race condition, the PMC value must be checked after disabling the counter. Add an AMD function, amd_pmu_disable_all(), that will wait for the NMI handler to reset any active and overflowed counter after calling x86_pmu_disable_all(). Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x- Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-03-01x86/events: Remove last remnants of old filenamesBorislav Petkov
Update to the new file paths, remove them from introductory comments. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170218113140.8051-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-11-18perf/x86: Add perf support for AMD family-17h processorsJanakarajan Natarajan
This patch enables perf core PMU support for the new AMD family-17h processors. In family-17h, there is no PMC-event constraint. All events, irrespective of the type, can be measured using any of the six generic performance counters. Signed-off-by: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479399306-13375-1-git-send-email-Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-16perf/x86/amd: Make HW_CACHE_REFERENCES and HW_CACHE_MISSES measure L2Matt Fleming
While the Intel PMU monitors the LLC when perf enables the HW_CACHE_REFERENCES and HW_CACHE_MISSES events, these events monitor L1 instruction cache fetches (0x0080) and instruction cache misses (0x0081) on the AMD PMU. This is extremely confusing when monitoring the same workload across Intel and AMD machines, since parameters like, $ perf stat -e cache-references,cache-misses measure completely different things. Instead, make the AMD PMU measure instruction/data cache and TLB fill requests to the L2 and instruction/data cache and TLB misses in the L2 when HW_CACHE_REFERENCES and HW_CACHE_MISSES are enabled, respectively. That way the events measure unified caches on both platforms. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472044328-21302-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-07-14perf/x86: Convert the core to the hotplug state machineThomas Gleixner
Replace the perf_notifier() install mechanism, which invokes magically the callback on the current CPU. Convert the hardware specific callbacks which are invoked from the x86 perf core to return proper error codes instead of totally pointless NOTIFY_BAD return values. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: rt@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160713153333.670720553@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28perf/x86/amd: Set the size of event map array to PERF_COUNT_HW_MAXAdam Borowski
The entry for PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES is not used on AMD, but is referenced by filter_events() which expects undefined events to have a value of 0. Found via KASAN: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:132:30 index 9 is out of range for type 'u64 [9]' UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:132:9 load of address ffffffff81c021c8 with insufficient space for an object of type 'const u64' Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461749731-30979-1-git-send-email-kilobyte@angband.pl Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-03-29perf/x86/amd: Cleanup Fam10h NB event constraintsPeter Zijlstra
Avoid allocating the AMD NB event constraints data structure when not needed. This gets rid of x86_max_cores usage and avoids allocating this on AMD Core Perfctr supporting hardware (which has separate MSRs for NB events). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: aherrmann@suse.com Cc: Rui Huang <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: jencce.kernel@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160320124629.GY6375@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-02-17perf/x86: Move perf_event.h to its new homeBorislav Petkov
Now that all functionality has been moved to arch/x86/events/, move the perf_event.h header and adjust include paths. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455098123-11740-18-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-02-09perf/x86: Move perf_event_amd.c ........... => x86/events/amd/core.cBorislav Petkov
We distribute those in vendor subdirs, starting with .../events/amd/. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454947748-28629-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>