summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdcAlex Chiang
The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are exactly the same. Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()Alex Chiang
The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get set in the input obj_list buffer. There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer, we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: factor out common _PDC settingsAlex Chiang
Both x86 and ia64 initialize _PDC with mostly common bit settings. Factor out the common settings and leave the arch-specific ones alone. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_init_pdcAlex Chiang
The x86 and ia64 implementations of arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() are almost exactly the same. The only difference is in what bits they set in obj_list buffer. Combine the boilerplate memory management code, and leave the arch-specific bit twiddling in separate implementations. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-22ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi_pdcAlex Chiang
arch dependent helper function that tells us if we should attempt to evaluate _PDC on this machine or not. The x86 implementation assumes that the CPUs in the machine must be homogeneous, and that you cannot mix CPUs of different vendors. Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-24[CPUFREQ] Enable ACPI PDC handshake for VIA/Centaur CPUsHarald Welte
In commit 0de51088e6a82bc8413d3ca9e28bbca2788b5b53, we introduced the use of acpi-cpufreq on VIA/Centaur CPU's by removing a vendor check for VENDOR_INTEL. However, as it turns out, at least the Nano CPU's also need the PDC (processor driver capabilities) handshake in order to activate the methods required for acpi-cpufreq. Since arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() contains another vendor check for Intel, the PDC is not initialized on VIA CPU's. The resulting behavior of a current mainline kernel on such systems is: acpi-cpufreq loads and it indicates CPU frequency changes. However, the CPU stays at a single frequency This trivial patch ensures that init_intel_pdc() is called on Intel and VIA/Centaur CPU's alike. Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@viatech.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2009-06-20ACPI: pdc init related memory leak with physical CPU hotplugPallipadi, Venkatesh
arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc() in x86 and ia64 results in memory allocated for _PDC objects that is never freed and will cause memory leak in case of physical CPU remove and add. Patch fixes the memory leak by freeing the objects soon after _PDC is evaluated. Reported-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-07-16ACPI: Disable the C2C3_FFH access mode HW has no MWAIT supportZhao Yakui
991528d7348667924176f3e29addea0675298944 (ACPI: Processor native C-states using MWAIT) started passing C2C3_FFH to _PDC to tell the BIOS that Linux supports MWAIT for deep C-states. However, we should first double check with the hardware that it actually supports MWAIT before potentially exposing a BIOS bug of an MWAIT _CST on HW that doesn't support MWAIT. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-04-19x86: remove pointless commentsWANG Cong
Remove old comments that include the old arch/i386 directory. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-02-02ACPI: Set _PSD ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORDZhao Yakui
The ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD bit is set by and OS that is capable of native ACPI throttling software coordination for mutli-processors using the _TSD information. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-11-16ACPI: Enable MSR (FixedHW) support for T-StatesZhao Yakui
Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses the FixHW Control Status registers. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-10-27x86: fix !SMP compiler warning in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.cJeff Garzik
Fix !CONFIG_SMP warning: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c: In function arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc: arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c:65: warning: unused variable cpu Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-19x86: convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu arrayMike Travis
cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus. When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data becomes 3,145,728 bytes. These changes were adopted from the sparc64 (and ia64) code. An additional field was added to cpuinfo_x86 to be a non-ambiguous cpu index. This corresponds to the index into a cpumask_t as well as the per_cpu index. It's used in various places like show_cpuinfo(). cpu_data is defined to be the boot_cpu_data structure for the NON-SMP case. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net> Cc: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386: move kernel/acpiThomas Gleixner
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>