summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-05-25driver core: add devname module aliases to allow module on-demand auto-loadingKay Sievers
This adds: alias: devname:<name> to some common kernel modules, which will allow the on-demand loading of the kernel module when the device node is accessed. Ideally all these modules would be compiled-in, but distros seems too much in love with their modularization that we need to cover the common cases with this new facility. It will allow us to remove a bunch of pretty useless init scripts and modprobes from init scripts. The static device node aliases will be carried in the module itself. The program depmod will extract this information to a file in the module directory: $ cat /lib/modules/2.6.34-00650-g537b60d-dirty/modules.devname # Device nodes to trigger on-demand module loading. microcode cpu/microcode c10:184 fuse fuse c10:229 ppp_generic ppp c108:0 tun net/tun c10:200 dm_mod mapper/control c10:235 Udev will pick up the depmod created file on startup and create all the static device nodes which the kernel modules specify, so that these modules get automatically loaded when the device node is accessed: $ /sbin/udevd --debug ... static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/cpu/microcode' c10:184 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/fuse' c10:229 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/ppp' c108:0 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/net/tun' c10:200 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/mapper/control' c10:235 udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/net/tun' 0666 udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/fuse' 0666 A few device nodes are switched to statically allocated numbers, to allow the static nodes to work. This might also useful for systems which still run a plain static /dev, which is completely unsafe to use with any dynamic minor numbers. Note: The devname aliases must be limited to the *common* and *single*instance* device nodes, like the misc devices, and never be used for conceptually limited systems like the loop devices, which should rather get fixed properly and get a control node for losetup to talk to, instead of creating a random number of device nodes in advance, regardless if they are ever used. This facility is to hide the mess distros are creating with too modualized kernels, and just to hide that these modules are not compiled-in, and not to paper-over broken concepts. Thanks! :) Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-04-14x86/microcode: Use nonseekable_open()Arnd Bergmann
No need to seek on this file, so prevent it outright so we can avoid using default_llseek - removes one more BKL usage. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [drop useless llseek = no_llseek and smp_lock.h inclusion] Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@relay.de.ibm.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <1270910781-8786-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-23Revert "x86: ucode-amd: Load ucode-patches once ..."Andreas Herrmann
Commit d1c84f79a6ba992dc01e312c44a21496303874d6 leads to a regression when microcode_amd.c is compiled into the kernel. It causes a big boot delay because the firmware is not available. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126267290920060 It also renders the reload sysfs attribute useless. Fixing this is too intrusive for an -rc5 kernel. Thus I'd like to restore the microcode loading behaviour of kernel 2.6.32. CC: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> LKML-Reference: <20100122203456.GB13792@alberich.amd.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-12-23Revert "x86, ucode-amd: Ensure ucode update on suspend/resume after CPU ↵Linus Torvalds
off/online cycle" This reverts commit 9f15226e75583547aaf542c6be4bdac1060dd425. It's just wrong, and broke resume for Rafael even on a non-AMD CPU. As Rafael says: "... it causes microcode_init_cpu() to be called during resume even for CPUs for which there's no microcode to apply. That, in turn, results in executing request_firmware() (on Intel CPUs at least) which doesn't work at this stage of resume (we have device interrupts disabled, I/O devices are still suspended and so on). If I'm not mistaken, the "if (uci->valid)" logic means "if that CPU is known to us" , so before commit 9f15226e755 microcode_resume_cpu() was called for all CPUs already in the system during suspend, which was the right thing to do. The commit changed it so that the CPUs without microcode to apply are now treated as "unknown", which is not quite right. The problem this commit attempted to solve has to be handled differently." Bisected-and -requested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-09arch/x86/kernel/microcode*: Use pr_fmt() and remove duplicated KERN_ERR prefixJoe Perches
- Use #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt - Remove "microcode: " prefix from each pr_<level> - Fix duplicated KERN_ERR prefix - Coalesce pr_<level> format strings - Add a space after an exclamation point No other change in output. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com> LKML-Reference: <1260340250.27677.191.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-08Merge branch 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: x86: ucode-amd: Move family check to microcde_amd.c's init function x86, ucode-amd: Ensure ucode update on suspend/resume after CPU off/online cycle x86: ucode-amd: Convert printk(KERN_*...) to pr_*(...) x86: ucode-amd: Don't warn when no ucode is available for a CPU revision x86: ucode-amd: Load ucode-patches once and not separately of each CPU x86, amd-ucode: Remove needless log messages
2009-11-11x86, ucode-amd: Ensure ucode update on suspend/resume after CPU off/online cycleAndreas Herrmann
When switching a CPU offline/online and then doing suspend/resume, ucode is not updated on this CPU. This is due to the microcode_fini_cpu() call which frees uci->mc when setting the CPU offline: static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; vfree(uci->mc); uci->mc = NULL; } When the CPU is set online uci->mc is still NULL because no ucode update is required. Finally this prevents ucode update when resuming after suspend: static enum ucode_state microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; if (!uci->mc) return UCODE_NFOUND; ... } Fix is to check whether uci->mc is valid before microcode_resume_cpu() is called. Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <20091111190329.GF18592@alberich.amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-10x86: ucode-amd: Load ucode-patches once and not separately of each CPUAndreas Herrmann
This also implies that corresponding log messages, e.g. platform microcode: firmware: requesting amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin show up only once on module load and not when ucode is updated for each CPU. Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <20091110110723.GH30802@alberich.amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-10-14x86: Remove BKL from microcodeThomas Gleixner
cycle_lock_kernel() in microcode_open() is a worthless exercise as there is nothing to wait for. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> LKML-Reference: <20091010153349.196074920@linutronix.de>
2009-09-22mm: replace various uses of num_physpages by totalram_pagesJan Beulich
Sizing of memory allocations shouldn't depend on the number of physical pages found in a system, as that generally includes (perhaps a huge amount of) non-RAM pages. The amount of what actually is usable as storage should instead be used as a basis here. Some of the calculations (i.e. those not intending to use high memory) should likely even use (totalram_pages - totalhigh_pages). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-19Driver-Core: extend devnode callbacks to provide permissionsKay Sievers
This allows subsytems to provide devtmpfs with non-default permissions for the device node. Instead of the default mode of 0600, null, zero, random, urandom, full, tty, ptmx now have a mode of 0666, which allows non-privileged processes to access standard device nodes in case no other userspace process applies the expected permissions. This also fixes a wrong assignment in pktcdvd and a checkpatch.pl complain. Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2009-06-15Driver Core: misc: add nodename support for misc devices.Kay Sievers
This adds support for misc devices to report their requested nodename to userspace. It also updates a number of misc drivers to provide the needed subdirectory and device name to be used for them. Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2009-05-12x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, ↵Dmitry Adamushko
cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-04-17Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: x86: fix microcode driver newly spewing warnings x86, PAT: Remove page granularity tracking for vm_insert_pfn maps x86: disable X86_PTRACE_BTS for now x86, documentation: kernel-parameters replace X86-32,X86-64 with X86 x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static x86, PAT: Remove duplicate memtype reserve in devmem mmap x86, PAT: Consolidate code in pat_x_mtrr_type() and reserve_memtype() x86, PAT: Changing memtype to WC ensuring no WB alias x86, PAT: Handle faults cleanly in set_memory_ APIs x86, PAT: Change order of cpa and free in set_memory_wb x86, CPA: Change idmap attribute before ioremap attribute setup
2009-04-17x86: fix microcode driver newly spewing warningsDmitry Adamushko
Jeff Garzik reported this WARN_ON() noise: > Kernel: 2.6.30-rc1-00306-g8371f87 > Hardware: ICH10 x86-64 > > This is a regression from 2.6.29. Microcode spews the following WARNING > multiple times during boot: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/group.c:138 sysfs_remove_group+0xeb/0xf0() > Hardware name: sysfs group ffffffffa0209700 not found for > kobject 'cpu0' Keep sysfs files around for cpus even when we failed to locate microcode for them at the moment of module loading. The appropriate microcode firmware can become available later on. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-04-14x86 microcode: revert some work_on_cpuHugh Dickins
Revert part of af5c820a3169e81af869c113e18ec7588836cd50 ("x86: cpumask: use work_on_cpu in arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c") That change is causing only one Intel CPU's microcode to be updated e.g. microcode: CPU3 updated from revision 0x9 to 0x17, date = 2005-04-22 where before it announced that also for CPU0 and CPU1 and CPU2. We cannot use work_on_cpu() in the CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE code, because Intel's request_microcode_user() involves a copy_from_user() from /sbin/microcode_ctl, which therefore needs to be on that CPU at the time. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-18x86: microcode: cleanupIngo Molnar
Impact: cleanup Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> LKML-Reference: <200903111632.37279.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-03-18x86: cpumask: use work_on_cpu in arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.cRusty Russell
Impact: don't play with current's cpumask Straightforward indirection through work_on_cpu(). One change is that the error code from microcode_update_cpu() is now actually plumbed back to microcode_init_cpu(), so now we printk if it fails on cpu hotplug. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> LKML-Reference: <200903111632.37279.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-23Merge branches 'x86/apic', 'x86/cleanups', 'x86/cpufeature', ↵Ingo Molnar
'x86/crashdump', 'x86/debug', 'x86/defconfig', 'x86/detect-hyper', 'x86/doc', 'x86/dumpstack', 'x86/early-printk', 'x86/fpu', 'x86/idle', 'x86/io', 'x86/memory-corruption-check', 'x86/microcode', 'x86/mm', 'x86/mtrr', 'x86/nmi-watchdog', 'x86/pat2', 'x86/pci-ioapic-boot-irq-quirks', 'x86/ptrace', 'x86/quirks', 'x86/reboot', 'x86/setup-memory', 'x86/signal', 'x86/sparse-fixes', 'x86/time', 'x86/uv' and 'x86/xen' into x86/core
2008-12-20x86: fix resume (S2R) broken by Intel microcode module, on A110LDmitry Adamushko
Impact: fix deadlock This is in response to the following bug report: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12100 Subject : resume (S2R) broken by Intel microcode module, on A110L Submitter : Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Date : 2008-11-25 08:48 (19 days old) Handled-By : Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> [ The deadlock scenario has been discovered by Andreas Mohr ] I think I might have a logical explanation why the system: (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12100) might hang upon resuming, OTOH it should have likely hanged each and every time. (1) possible deadlock in microcode_resume_cpu() if either 'if' section is taken; (2) now, I don't see it in spec. and can't experimentally verify it (newer ucodes don't seem to be available for my Core2duo)... but logically-wise, I'd think that when read upon resuming, the 'microcode revision' (MSR 0x8B) should be back to its original one (we need to reload ucode anyway so it doesn't seem logical if a cpu doesn't drop the version)... if so, the comparison with memcmp() for the full 'struct cpu_signature' is wrong... and that's how one of the aforementioned 'if' sections might have been triggered - leading to a deadlock. Obviously, in my tests I simulated loading/resuming with the ucode of the same version (just to see that the file is loaded/re-loaded upon resuming) so this issue has never popped up. I'd appreciate if someone with an appropriate system might give a try to the 2nd patch (titled "fix a comparison && deadlock..."). In any case, the deadlock situation is a must-have fix. Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-26x86: microcode: fix sparse warningsHannes Eder
Impact: make global variables and a function static Fix following sparse warnings: arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:102:22: warning: symbol 'microcode_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:206:24: warning: symbol 'microcode_pdev' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:322:6: warning: symbol 'microcode_update_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c:468:22: warning: symbol 'microcode_intel_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-28x86: microcode patch loader author updatePeter Oruba
Removed one author's email address from module init message. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-02x86/microcode: fix sleeping function called from invalid context at ↵Dmitry Adamushko
kernel/mutex.c Fix the following "sleeping function called from invalid context" bug: ... __might_sleep mutex_lock_nested microcode_update_cpu mc_sysdev_resume __sysdev_resume sysdev_resume device_power_up ... Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-24x86: microcode patch loader bugfixPeter Oruba
Corrected CPU vendor check condition for AMD microcode patch loader initialization. Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-23x86: moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.cDmitry Adamushko
Combine both generic and arch-specific parts of microcode into a single module (arch-specific parts are config-dependent). Also while we are at it, move arch-specific parts from microcode.h into their respective arch-specific .c files. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>