summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/blk-rq-qos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-07-19rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttle try twoJan Kara
commit 11c7aa0ddea8611007768d3e6b58d45dc60a19e1 upstream. Commit 545fbd0775ba ("rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttle") tried to fix a problem that a process could be sleeping in rq_qos_wait() without anyone to wake it up. However the fix is not complete and the following can still happen: CPU1 (waiter1) CPU2 (waiter2) CPU3 (waker) rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wait() acquire_inflight_cb() -> fails acquire_inflight_cb() -> fails completes IOs, inflight decreased prepare_to_wait_exclusive() prepare_to_wait_exclusive() has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper() -> true as there are two sleepers has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper() -> true io_schedule() io_schedule() Deadlock as now there's nobody to wakeup the two waiters. The logic automatically blocking when there are already sleepers is really subtle and the only way to make it work reliably is that we check whether there are some waiters in the queue when adding ourselves there. That way, we are guaranteed that at least the first process to enter the wait queue will recheck the waiting condition before going to sleep and thus guarantee forward progress. Fixes: 545fbd0775ba ("rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttle") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210607112613.25344-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-10-06blk-wbt: fix performance regression in wbt scale_up/scale_downHarshad Shirwadkar
scale_up wakes up waiters after scaling up. But after scaling max, it should not wake up more waiters as waiters will not have anything to do. This patch fixes this by making scale_up (and also scale_down) return when threshold is reached. This bug causes increased fdatasync latency when fdatasync and dd conv=sync are performed in parallel on 4.19 compared to 4.14. This bug was introduced during refactoring of blk-wbt code. Fixes: a79050434b45 ("blk-rq-qos: refactor out common elements of blk-wbt") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-08-28block/rq_qos: implement rq_qos_ops->queue_depth_changed()Tejun Heo
wbt already gets queue depth changed notification through wbt_set_queue_depth(). Generalize it into rq_qos_ops->queue_depth_changed() so that other rq_qos policies can easily hook into the events too. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-08-28block/rq_qos: add rq_qos_merge()Tejun Heo
Add a merge hook for rq_qos. This will be used by io.weight. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-07-18rq-qos: use a mb for got_tokenJosef Bacik
Oleg noticed that our checking of data.got_token is unsafe in the cleanup case, and should really use a memory barrier. Use a wmb on the write side, and a rmb() on the read side. We don't need one in the main loop since we're saved by set_current_state(). Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-07-18rq-qos: set ourself TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE after we scheduleJosef Bacik
In case we get a spurious wakeup we need to make sure to re-set ourselves to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE so we don't busy wait. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-07-18rq-qos: don't reset has_sleepers on spurious wakeupsJosef Bacik
If we raced with somebody else getting an inflight counter we could fail to get an inflight counter with no sleepers on the list, and thus need to go to sleep. In this case has_sleepers should be true because we are now relying on the waker to get our inflight counter for us. And in the case of spurious wakeups we'd still want this to be the case. So set has_sleepers to true if we went to sleep to make sure we're woken up the proper way. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-07-18rq-qos: fix missed wake-ups in rq_qos_throttleJosef Bacik
We saw a hang in production with WBT where there was only one waiter in the throttle path and no outstanding IO. This is because of the has_sleepers optimization that is used to make sure we don't steal an inflight counter for new submitters when there are people already on the list. We can race with our check to see if the waitqueue has any waiters (this is done locklessly) and the time we actually add ourselves to the waitqueue. If this happens we'll go to sleep and never be woken up because nobody is doing IO to wake us up. Fix this by checking if the waitqueue has a single sleeper on the list after we add ourselves, that way we have an uptodate view of the list. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-05-31block: Fix rq_qos_wait() kernel-doc headerBart Van Assche
Add documentation for the @rqw argument and change " - " into ": ". Fixes: 84f603246db9 ("block: add rq_qos_wait to rq_qos") # v5.0-rc1~52^2~140. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chiatanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2019-04-30block: add SPDX tags to block layer files missing licensing informationChristoph Hellwig
Various block layer files do not have any licensing information at all. Add SPDX tags for the default kernel GPLv2 license to those. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-12-16blk-mq-debugfs: support rq_qosMing Lei
blk-mq-debugfs has been proved as very helpful for debug some tough issues, such as IO hang. We have seen blk-wbt related IO hang several times, even inside Red Hat BZ, there is such report not sovled yet, so this patch adds support debugfs on rq_qos. Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-12-07block: add rq_qos_wait to rq_qosJosef Bacik
Originally when I split out the common code from blk-wbt into rq_qos I left the wbt_wait() where it was and simply copied and modified it slightly to work for io-latency. However they are both basically the same thing, and as time has gone on wbt_wait() has ended up much smarter and kinder than it was when I copied it into io-latency, which means io-latency has lost out on these improvements. Since they are the same thing essentially except for a few minor things, create rq_qos_wait() that replicates what wbt_wait() currently does with callbacks that can be passed in for the snowflakes to do their own thing as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-11-16blk-rq-qos: inline check for q->rq_qos functionsJens Axboe
Put the short code in the fast path, where we don't have any functions attached to the queue. This minimizes the impact on the hot path in the core code. Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-11-15block: remove the unused lock argument to rq_qos_throttleChristoph Hellwig
Unused now that the legacy request path is gone. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-22blk-rq-qos: make depth comparisons unsignedJosef Bacik
With the change to use UINT_MAX I broke the depth check as any value of inflight (ie 0) would be less than (int)UINT_MAX. Fix this by changing everything to unsigned int to match the depth. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-09rq-qos: introduce dio_bio callbackJosef Bacik
wbt cares only about request completion time, but controllers may need information that is on the bio itself, so add a done_bio callback for rq-qos so things like blk-iolatency can use it to have the bio when it completes. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-09block: remove external dependency on wbt_flagsJosef Bacik
We don't really need to save this stuff in the core block code, we can just pass the bio back into the helpers later on to derive the same flags and update the rq->wbt_flags appropriately. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-07-09blk-rq-qos: refactor out common elements of blk-wbtJosef Bacik
blkcg-qos is going to do essentially what wbt does, only on a cgroup basis. Break out the common code that will be shared between blkcg-qos and wbt into blk-rq-qos.* so they can both utilize the same infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>