| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
commit c043ec1ca5baae63726aae32abbe003192bc6eec upstream.
Currently, we use int for buffer length and bytes_per_datum. However,
kfifo uses unsigned int for length and size_t for element size. We need
to make sure these matches or we will have bugs related to overflow (in
the range between INT_MAX and UINT_MAX for length, for example).
In addition, set_bytes_per_datum uses size_t while bytes_per_datum is an
int, which would cause bugs for large values of bytes_per_datum.
Change buffer length to use unsigned int and bytes_per_datum to use
size_t.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <mkelly@xevo.com>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.4:
- Drop change to iio_dma_buffer_set_length()
- Adjust filename, context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 3d13de4b027d5f6276c0f9d3a264f518747d83f2 upstream.
Currently, the following causes a kernel OOPS in memcpy:
echo 1073741825 > buffer/length
echo 1 > buffer/enable
Note that using 1073741824 instead of 1073741825 causes "write error:
Cannot allocate memory" but no OOPS.
This is because 1073741824 == 2^30 and 1073741825 == 2^30+1. Since kfifo
rounds up to the nearest power of 2, it will actually call kmalloc with
roundup_pow_of_two(length) * bytes_per_datum.
Using length == 1073741825 and bytes_per_datum == 2, we get:
kmalloc(roundup_pow_of_two(1073741825) * 2
or kmalloc(2147483648 * 2)
or kmalloc(4294967296)
or kmalloc(UINT_MAX + 1)
so this overflows to 0, causing kmalloc to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR and
subsequent memcpy to fail once the device is enabled.
Fix this by checking for overflow prior to allocating a kfifo. With this
check added, the above code returns -EINVAL when enabling the buffer,
rather than causing an OOPS.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <mkelly@xevo.com>
cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
For generic IIO trigger implementations we already have a sub-directory,
but the generic buffer implementations currently reside in the IIO
top-level directory. The main reason is that things have historically grown
into this form.
With more generic buffer implementations on its way now is the perfect time
to clean this up and introduce a sub-directory for generic buffer
implementations to avoid too much clutter in the top-level directory.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
|
