From aee636c4809fa54848ff07a899b326eb1f9987a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:50:07 -0800 Subject: bpf: do not use reciprocal divide At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide were not correct. (off by one in some cases) http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c He could also show this with BPF: http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough, lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with current cpus. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki Cc: Mircea Gherzan Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa Cc: Matt Evans Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/net') diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c index 9ed155ad0f97..271b5e971568 100644 --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -641,10 +641,10 @@ load_ind: emit(ARM_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_X), ctx); break; case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: - /* current k == reciprocal_value(userspace k) */ + if (k == 1) + break; emit_mov_i(r_scratch, k, ctx); - /* A = top 32 bits of the product */ - emit(ARM_UMULL(r_scratch, r_A, r_A, r_scratch), ctx); + emit_udiv(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx); break; case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: update_on_xread(ctx); -- cgit v1.2.3