From c93b263e0d4fa8ce5fec0142a98196d1a127e845 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:50:04 +0200 Subject: libata: clean up lpm related symbols and sysfs show/store functions Link power management related symbols are in confusing state w/ mixed usages of lpm, ipm and pm. This patch cleans up lpm related symbols and sysfs show/store functions as follows. * lpm states - NOT_AVAILABLE, MIN_POWER, MAX_PERFORMANCE and MEDIUM_POWER are renamed to ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN and ATA_LPM_{MIN|MAX|MED}_POWER. * Pre/postfixes are unified to lpm. * sysfs show/store functions for link_power_management_policy were curiously named get/put and unnecessarily complex. Renamed to show/store and simplified. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c index f1c0118c6d4b..aa56681f68db 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c @@ -103,72 +103,50 @@ static const u8 def_control_mpage[CONTROL_MPAGE_LEN] = { 0, 30 /* extended self test time, see 05-359r1 */ }; -static const struct { - enum link_pm value; - const char *name; -} link_pm_policy[] = { - { NOT_AVAILABLE, "max_performance" }, - { MIN_POWER, "min_power" }, - { MAX_PERFORMANCE, "max_performance" }, - { MEDIUM_POWER, "medium_power" }, +static const char *ata_lpm_policy_names[] = { + [ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN] = "max_performance", + [ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER] = "max_performance", + [ATA_LPM_MED_POWER] = "medium_power", + [ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER] = "min_power", }; -static const char *ata_scsi_lpm_get(enum link_pm policy) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(link_pm_policy); i++) - if (link_pm_policy[i].value == policy) - return link_pm_policy[i].name; - - return NULL; -} - -static ssize_t ata_scsi_lpm_put(struct device *dev, - struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *buf, size_t count) +static ssize_t ata_scsi_lpm_store(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) { struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev); struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(shost); - enum link_pm policy = 0; - int i; + enum ata_lpm_policy policy; - /* - * we are skipping array location 0 on purpose - this - * is because a value of NOT_AVAILABLE is displayed - * to the user as max_performance, but when the user - * writes "max_performance", they actually want the - * value to match MAX_PERFORMANCE. - */ - for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(link_pm_policy); i++) { - const int len = strlen(link_pm_policy[i].name); - if (strncmp(link_pm_policy[i].name, buf, len) == 0) { - policy = link_pm_policy[i].value; + /* UNKNOWN is internal state, iterate from MAX_POWER */ + for (policy = ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER; + policy < ARRAY_SIZE(ata_lpm_policy_names); policy++) { + const char *name = ata_lpm_policy_names[policy]; + + if (strncmp(name, buf, strlen(name)) == 0) break; - } } - if (!policy) + if (policy == ARRAY_SIZE(ata_lpm_policy_names)) return -EINVAL; ata_lpm_schedule(ap, policy); return count; } -static ssize_t -ata_scsi_lpm_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +static ssize_t ata_scsi_lpm_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev); struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(shost); - const char *policy = - ata_scsi_lpm_get(ap->pm_policy); - if (!policy) + if (ap->lpm_policy >= ARRAY_SIZE(ata_lpm_policy_names)) return -EINVAL; - return snprintf(buf, 23, "%s\n", policy); + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", + ata_lpm_policy_names[ap->lpm_policy]); } DEVICE_ATTR(link_power_management_policy, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, - ata_scsi_lpm_show, ata_scsi_lpm_put); + ata_scsi_lpm_show, ata_scsi_lpm_store); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_attr_link_power_management_policy); static ssize_t ata_scsi_park_show(struct device *device, -- cgit v1.2.3