From d2690c0db7146b12e4fc2d572053c823e512758a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:10:39 -0700 Subject: iwlagn: use proper good CRC threshold behaviour New microcode versions use the good CRC threshold field differently, as a flag, and in that case we should set it to 1/0 instead of 1/65535 for an active/passive scan. The new behaviour is advertised by the uCode with a feature flag. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy --- drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 12 ++++++++++-- drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c | 3 +++ drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h | 7 +++++-- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c index 75e1035330be..7fe9e0f17b1e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c @@ -1294,9 +1294,17 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) * mean we never reach it, but at the same time work around * the aforementioned issue. Thus use IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER * here instead of IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED. + * + * This was fixed in later versions along with some other + * scan changes, and the threshold behaves as a flag in those + * versions. */ - scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : - IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER; + if (priv->new_scan_threshold_behaviour) + scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : + IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED; + else + scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : + IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER; band = priv->scan_band; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c index c27147c4d4a7..395d1ade39d3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c @@ -1716,6 +1716,9 @@ static void iwl_ucode_callback(const struct firmware *ucode_raw, void *context) priv->cfg->base_params->max_event_log_size; priv->_agn.inst_errlog_ptr = pieces.inst_errlog_ptr; + priv->new_scan_threshold_behaviour = + !!(ucode_capa.flags & IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_NEWSCAN); + if (ucode_capa.flags & IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_PAN) { priv->valid_contexts |= BIT(IWL_RXON_CTX_PAN); priv->sta_key_max_num = STA_KEY_MAX_NUM_PAN; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h index 197fa742f79a..f098eff263f8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h @@ -547,12 +547,13 @@ enum iwl_ucode_tlv_type { * enum iwl_ucode_tlv_flag - ucode API flags * @IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_PAN: This is PAN capable microcode; this previously * was a separate TLV but moved here to save space. - * @IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_RESERVED_1: reserved + * @IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_NEWSCAN: new uCode scan behaviour on hidden SSID, + * treats good CRC threshold as a boolean * @IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_MFP: This uCode image supports MFP (802.11w). */ enum iwl_ucode_tlv_flag { IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_PAN = BIT(0), - IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_RESERVED_1 = BIT(1), + IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_NEWSCAN = BIT(1), IWL_UCODE_TLV_FLAGS_MFP = BIT(2), }; @@ -1263,6 +1264,8 @@ struct iwl_priv { /* max number of station keys */ u8 sta_key_max_num; + bool new_scan_threshold_behaviour; + /* EEPROM MAC addresses */ struct mac_address addresses[2]; -- cgit v1.2.3