From 28254520f46eeadda8834de0ccf31613caee998f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:57 +0900 Subject: libata: backport ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST and ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA Differs from mainline, but the functionality is already there. Backport ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST and ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA. These are originally link flags (ATA_LFLAG_*) but link abstraction doesn't exist on 2.6.23, so make it port flags. This is for the following workaround for ASUS P5W DH Deluxe. These new flags don't introduce any behavior change unless set and nobody sets them yet. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/libata.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h index a67bb9075e9b..9ccca8f0a47a 100644 --- a/include/linux/libata.h +++ b/include/linux/libata.h @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ enum { ATA_FLAG_IGN_SIMPLEX = (1 << 15), /* ignore SIMPLEX */ ATA_FLAG_NO_IORDY = (1 << 16), /* controller lacks iordy */ ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA = (1 << 17), /* need native SATA ACPI layout */ + ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST = (1 << 18), + ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA = (1 << 19), /* The following flag belongs to ap->pflags but is kept in * ap->flags because it's referenced in many LLDs and will be -- cgit v1.2.3