From 66f3b8e2e103a0b93b945764d98e9ba46cb926dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:19:46 +0200 Subject: writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info This is a first step at introducing per-bdi flusher threads. We should have no change in behaviour, although sb_has_dirty_inodes() is now ridiculously expensive, as there's no easy way to answer that question. Not a huge problem, since it'll be deleted in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/page-writeback.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/page-writeback.c') diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 81627ebcd313..f8341b6019bf 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -320,15 +320,13 @@ static void task_dirty_limit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *pdirty) /* * */ -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdi_lock); static unsigned int bdi_min_ratio; int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio) { int ret = 0; - unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&bdi_lock); if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) { ret = -EINVAL; } else { @@ -340,27 +338,26 @@ int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio) ret = -EINVAL; } } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock); return ret; } int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio) { - unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; if (max_ratio > 100) return -EINVAL; - spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&bdi_lock); if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) { ret = -EINVAL; } else { bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio; bdi->max_prop_frac = (PROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100; } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3